Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > Low-Carb War Zone
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 06:21
Quinadal's Avatar
Quinadal Quinadal is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 596
 
Plan: HFH
Stats: 297/291/200 Female 65 inches
BF:
Progress: 6%
Location: Florida, USA
Default Re: Re: ???

Quote:
Originally posted by infuriator
Thanks for the response. Another question, don't you think that the high amount of fat that the Atkins Diet suggests is to high in fat as it relates to laying down plaque on the arterial walls and do you think that the large amounts of fat allowed will be deposited as depot fat.
Also, has anyone here had their bodyfat tested before and after trying the Atkins Diet and if so, how much did your lean body mass improve, if at all.

Nope! Because that's what insulin controls and if you don't load up on carbs, then there ISN'T the extra insulin to make the extra cholesterol, to thicken the arterial walls, or make your body store the fat as fat!
The amount of carbs that LC'ers eat just makes enough insulin to regulate the systems NORMALLY and to best efficiency.

Oh and BTW, I'M a nurse too!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #62   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 06:28
infuriator infuriator is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 21
 
Plan: None
Stats: 165/170/170
BF:
Progress: 100%
Default Re: Re: Re: ???

Quote:
Originally posted by Quinadal
Nope! Because that's what insulin controls and if you don't load up on carbs, then there ISN'T the extra insulin to make the extra cholesterol, to thicken the arterial walls, or make your body store the fat as fat!
The amount of carbs that LC'ers eat just makes enough insulin to regulate the systems NORMALLY and to best efficiency.

Oh and BTW, I'M a nurse too!
I am not talking about cholesterol laying down fat I am talking about fat laying down plaque on the arterial walls. Also, how about the fact that the nervous system and brain feed on carbs and need a certain amount of them. In addition, why are carbs so bad when you consider that two thirds of the carbs ingested is needed by the brain and the nervous system. Carbs are vital in this respect.
Reply With Quote
  #63   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 06:36
Quinadal's Avatar
Quinadal Quinadal is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 596
 
Plan: HFH
Stats: 297/291/200 Female 65 inches
BF:
Progress: 6%
Location: Florida, USA
Default

The brain and nervous system DON'T NEED CARBS!
They're perfectly happy running off ketones!
And fat doesn't lay ANYTHING in the arteries without high amounts of carbs to make the insulin levels get higher!
Insulin also causes high blood pressure and thickens the arterial walls!


Admin note - post edited to remove inflammatory comment. Doreen
Reply With Quote
  #64   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 06:44
agonycat's Avatar
agonycat agonycat is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 3,473
 
Plan: AHP&FP
Stats: 197/125/137 Female 5' 6"
BF:42%/22%/21%
Progress: 120%
Location: Dallas, Texas
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: ???

Quote:
Originally posted by infuriator
Also, how about the fact that the nervous system and brain feed on carbs and need a certain amount of them. In addition, why are carbs so bad when you consider that two thirds of the carbs ingested is needed by the brain and the nervous system. Carbs are vital in this respect.


I see someone didn't read the link I provided to him yesterday.

I use to think exactly the way you did about the carb limit until we got into THIS discussion.

Perhaps if you read it, you may understand a bit more on the human body doesn't need carbs to function
Reply With Quote
  #65   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 07:19
agonycat's Avatar
agonycat agonycat is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 3,473
 
Plan: AHP&FP
Stats: 197/125/137 Female 5' 6"
BF:42%/22%/21%
Progress: 120%
Location: Dallas, Texas
Default

Another article you may find an interesting read if you haven't seen it yet: New York Times
Reply With Quote
  #66   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 07:26
Dana114's Avatar
Dana114 Dana114 is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 29
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 185/143/145 Female 5' 7 1/2"
BF:43%/19.6%/19.6%
Progress: 105%
Location: Texas
Default Re: Re: Re: Re: ???

Quote:
Originally posted by infuriator
I am not talking about cholesterol laying down fat I am talking about fat laying down plaque on the arterial walls. Also, how about the fact that the nervous system and brain feed on carbs and need a certain amount of them. In addition, why are carbs so bad when you consider that two thirds of the carbs ingested is needed by the brain and the nervous system. Carbs are vital in this respect.



ummmm, fat *IS* the cholesterol floating around in our systems, 5% comes from our diets and 95% is produced by the liver. What do think cholesterol is?? This diet REDUCES cholesterol because it causes fat burning resulting in lower LDL and triglycerides and higher HDL.


The brain operates 25% more efficiently on ketones and does not need carbs to operate.

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/s...01789585&EDATE=

From What if It's All Been a Big Fat Lie:

When I interviewed ketosis experts, however, they universally sided with Atkins, and suggested that maybe the medical community and the media confuse ketosis with ketoacidosis, a variant of ketosis that occurs in untreated diabetics and can be fatal. ''Doctors are scared of ketosis,'' says Richard Veech, an N.I.H. researcher who studied medicine at Harvard and then got his doctorate at Oxford University with the Nobel Laureate Hans Krebs. ''They're always worried about diabetic ketoacidosis. But ketosis is a normal physiologic state. I would argue it is the normal state of man. It's not normal to have McDonald's and a delicatessen around every corner. It's normal to starve.''

Simply put, ketosis is evolution's answer to the thrifty gene. We may have evolved to efficiently store fat for times of famine, says Veech, but we also evolved ketosis to efficiently live off that fat when necessary. Rather than being poison, which is how the press often refers to ketones, they make the body run more efficiently and provide a backup fuel source for the brain. Veech calls ketones ''magic'' and has shown that both the heart and brain run 25 percent more efficiently on ketones than on blood sugar.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/07/m...ll&position=top
Reply With Quote
  #67   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 07:28
BruceH BruceH is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 6
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 255/240/180
BF:
Progress: 20%
Default

I've been doing Atkins for more than three years and according to my bloodwork, I haven't been this healthy since I was in my 20s (I'm in my 50s). I'd like this Atkins skeptic to provide us with harder evidence than the OPINIONS of people who have never tried it. If Atkins ruined my health, I'd make it my life's work to inform people about it. I'd be on all the talk shows. I'd be haunting all the chat boards. I'd sue Atkins for everything he has. I'd start my own web site and do interviews with the media. I'd ask Hillary where I could hire a good ghost writer to write a book that I could claim as my own. But nobody is doing that. Where are all the victims? Can this skeptic provide us with any statistics? How many people were harmed by low carbing last year? How many people have died? Give us a few case histories. What are their names? What happened to them? In what medical journal are their cases reported? Surely the Census Bureau can provide him with this information since they know how many flush toilets every household in America has. Can this person come up with even ONE verifiable case of Atkins harming anyone in the last 20 years? I'm a journalist and I certainly haven't been able to find anyone. All I've ever encountered is shallow thinkers who parrot the uncorroborated claims that have been circulating since the 70s. Maybe Dr. Atkins has a team of black-clad commandos who spirit these people away in the dead of the night so they can't tell their stories.

Last edited by BruceH : Thu, Oct-03-02 at 08:49.
Reply With Quote
  #68   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 07:36
agonycat's Avatar
agonycat agonycat is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 3,473
 
Plan: AHP&FP
Stats: 197/125/137 Female 5' 6"
BF:42%/22%/21%
Progress: 120%
Location: Dallas, Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by BruceH
Maybe Dr. Atkins has a team of black-clad commandos who spirit these people away in the dead of the night so they can't tell their stories.


Oh now that is a thought! Maybe they are in a hanger in Area 51 with the Alien's?

No wait that wouldn't work. If there were opponents of Atkin's the government would WANT them to come forward so they don't look like idiots for pushing the Food Pyramid on is

Reply With Quote
  #69   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 07:56
BruceH BruceH is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 6
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 255/240/180
BF:
Progress: 20%
Default

Shhhh, don't say the g word. You could be next.
Reply With Quote
  #70   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 08:05
TeriDoodle TeriDoodle is offline
Starting Over!
Posts: 3,435
 
Plan: Protein Power LifePlan
Stats: 182/178/150 Female 67 inches
BF:Jiggley mess
Progress: 13%
Location: Texas!!
Default

LOVE IT, Bruce!!! Well said!!
Reply With Quote
  #71   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 08:09
Buckett Buckett is offline
New Member
Posts: 1
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 180/128/125
BF:
Progress: 95%
Location: Texas
Default Re: Re: ???

Quote:
Originally posted by infuriator

Also, has anyone here had their bodyfat tested before and after trying the Atkins Diet and if so, how much did your lean body mass improve, if at all.


My lean body mass went up. I gained 4 pounds of muscle overall without any exercise during on-going weight loss.
Reply With Quote
  #72   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 08:20
Thelma's Avatar
Thelma Thelma is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 215
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 178/166.0/140 Female 5'9"/174cm
BF:30.4/30.4/25?
Progress: 32%
Location: Southern Indiana
Default

Infuriator,

I'm just curious - after reading all the info you've been given here so far, are you at least willing to open your mind a bit more and check into this further?

My guess is, that considering what information we were ALL fed growing up, everyone (99%? - guessing) of all low carbers were very skeptical at first. Who wouldn't be?
Reply With Quote
  #73   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 08:25
tofi's Avatar
tofi tofi is offline
Posts: 6,204
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 244/220/170 Female 65.4inches
BF:
Progress: 32%
Location: Ontario
Default

I have just passed 4 years, mostly on LC. The weight loss hasn't been too big because of medications & surgery and going off the plan. But my health is much better. BP always was normal 120/80 but quickly went to low normal 113/76 and has stayed there for 4 years. I have successfully come through 2 major surgeries, and blood tests pre-op each time showed excellent kidney and liver function. The cardiologist said I have "fantastic heart function".

By the way, I did Atkins back in 1972 for 6 months and got down to 145 and looked great. But I somehow didn't realize that I should have kept on eating lowcarb. Now I know that so this is my way of eating forever. And 30 years later, my kidneys and liver AND arteries are in great shape, even after 4 years of really staying LC much of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #74   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 09:44
doreen T's Avatar
doreen T doreen T is offline
Forum Founder
Posts: 37,223
 
Plan: LC paleo
Stats: 241/188/140 Female 165 cm
BF:
Progress: 52%
Location: Eastern ON, Canada
Default

It's fine to disagree with and debate each other's opinions, but personal attacks and flames are a direct violation of the Registration Agreement. I posted a warning in this thread yesterday.

I have removed some inflammatory posts.
============================

For the record, only certain cells in the mid-brain, and red blood cells MUST have glucose, since they lack mitochondria and cannot use ketones or other fatty acid derivatives. The small amounts of glucose required does not need to be consumed in the diet, since the liver can manufacture glucose quite nicely from dietary proteins, in the process of gluconeogenesis. Please review your first year physiology texts for an explanation of this process.

Doreen
Reply With Quote
  #75   ^
Old Thu, Oct-03-02, 09:47
BruceH BruceH is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 6
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 255/240/180
BF:
Progress: 20%
Default

It isn't flaming if it's true. I'm sorry to see that you deleted one of my messages the same day I registered, while you allowed that person to torment people for days. This is not the environment for me. At any rate, my work here is done. I'm off to my home Atkins board. Adios.

Last edited by BruceH : Thu, Oct-03-02 at 10:32.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.