Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Daily Low-Carb Support > General Low-Carb
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Mon, Oct-21-19, 13:54
Bob-a-rama's Avatar
Bob-a-rama Bob-a-rama is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,961
 
Plan: Keto (Atkins Induction)
Stats: 235/175/185 Male 5' 11"
BF:
Progress: 120%
Location: Florida
Default The average American consumes almost 152 pounds of sugar in one year

This is unsubstantiated info from a newsletter I receive so I'm posting it here in the "general" rather than research forums:
Sugar threatens more than thin waistlines. It has also been associated with several conditions and diseases, including type 2 diabetes, arthritis, acne, heart disease, depression, thrush/yeast infections, and cancer.

According to brain scans, sugar is as addictive as cocaine.

Two hundred years ago, the average American ate only 2 pounds of sugar a year. In 1970, Americans ate 123 pounds of sugar per year. Today the average American consumes almost 152 pounds of sugar in one year. This is equal to 3 pounds (or 6 cups) of sugar consumed in one week.

We are the exceptions I guess -- so somebody must be eating more than 152lb to make up for my almost zero share.

Bob
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Mon, Oct-21-19, 13:59
Ms Arielle's Avatar
Ms Arielle Ms Arielle is online now
Senior Member
Posts: 19,214
 
Plan: atkins, carnivore 2023
Stats: 200/211/163 Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: -30%
Location: Massachusetts
Default

lol, yup someone else is making up for me , and my family !!

Actually this number ,152, is almost at the quantity published in DANDR many years ago. Have seen the 170's as a published amount in the between years. Not that the 20 lb difference has made a difference.

Last edited by Ms Arielle : Tue, Oct-22-19 at 12:04.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Tue, Oct-22-19, 10:00
CityGirl8 CityGirl8 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 856
 
Plan: Protein Power, IF
Stats: 238/204/145 Female 5'8"
BF:53.75%/46.6%/25%
Progress: 37%
Location: PNW
Default

I've said it--we've all said it--over and over: the number of foods that have unnecessary added sugar in them is absurd. That's where so much of this is coming from. Salad dressing, ketchup, meatballs. It's virtually impossible to buy mayonnaise without sugar in it. A lot of people don't even realize that so much of what they're eating has sugar in it. Not to mention the sugar in the "non-sugar" cereal at breakfast with a vat of OJ on the side.

When I was a kid, my step-Mom used to make amazing apple pie. She was known for it. Some of our friends used to request it, if they were coming for dinner. It had zero sugar in it. Maybe sometimes a sprinkle (like a tablespoon or two) if the apples were especially sour. She learned to make it this way because her dad and sister were T1 diabetics. But really this is how people used to make pie until maybe the 1950s when we really started adding 1/2 cup or a cup of sugar. Cooked fruit has a ton of natural sweetness, but our tastebuds are so broken, we don't know that any more.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Tue, Oct-22-19, 10:48
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 14,674
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CityGirl8
Cooked fruit has a ton of natural sweetness, but our tastebuds are so broken, we don't know that any more.


I've avoided sugar for so long I have a much lower tolerance. Heavy cream sweetens my coffee, stevia sweetens my chocolate, and berries sweeten my yogurt.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Tue, Oct-22-19, 12:08
Ms Arielle's Avatar
Ms Arielle Ms Arielle is online now
Senior Member
Posts: 19,214
 
Plan: atkins, carnivore 2023
Stats: 200/211/163 Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: -30%
Location: Massachusetts
Default

Even diet coke tastes too sweet..... needs cutting with lots of ice cubes.


And when making apple pie------ no added sugar to the apples. Just spices. Just as CG said, tastes just fine.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Tue, Oct-22-19, 23:52
s93uv3h's Avatar
s93uv3h s93uv3h is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,662
 
Plan: Atkins & IF / TRE
Stats: 000/000/000 Male 5' 10"
BF:
Progress: 97%
Default

Gary's book is a great read. Goodreads synopsis below:

The Case Against Sugar, Gary Taubes

From the best-selling author of Why We Get Fat, a groundbreaking, eye-opening expose that makes the convincing case that sugar is the tobacco of the new millennium: backed by powerful lobbies, entrenched in our lives, and making us very sick.

Among Americans, diabetes is more prevalent today than ever; obesity is at epidemic proportions; nearly 10% of children are thought to have nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. And sugar is at the root of these, and other, critical society-wide, health-related problems. With his signature command of both science and straight talk, Gary Taubes delves into Americans' history with sugar: its uses as a preservative, as an additive in cigarettes, the contemporary overuse of high-fructose corn syrup. He explains what research has shown about our addiction to sweets. He clarifies the arguments against sugar, corrects misconceptions about the relationship between sugar and weight loss; and provides the perspective necessary to make informed decisions about sugar as individuals and as a society.
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Wed, Oct-23-19, 08:17
GRB5111's Avatar
GRB5111 GRB5111 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 4,038
 
Plan: Very LC, Higher Protein
Stats: 227/186/185 Male 6' 0"
BF:
Progress: 98%
Location: Herndon, VA
Default

Considering Bob's original post, I believe this is a fairly accurate representation of the sugar and derivatives consumed in the US and in many of the prosperous countries in the world. One needs only to look at the health statistics that show the incredible rise over the years in diseases related to metabolic syndrome while during the very same period the reduction in cost and availability along with the massive increase in sugar consumption. Given recent research and the experiences of those who have cut all sugars and other forms of carbs to regain health and eliminate metabolic-related disease and unhealthy symptoms, it would not be a stretch to posit a cause and effect. It's incredible how obesity is so prevalent today where in the early half of the 20th century, it was rare.

If you put someone from the 1940s into a time machine and dropped them into Mobile, Alabama (not criticizing, it could be any city) in 2019, they would be shocked and believe they were in a fantasy world given the differences in body sizes and shapes of most people. Many people who believe they are fit today would have been considered overweight 70 years ago. It has happened so gradually, we are now accepting obesity and diseases like T2D as normal and a lifelong affliction. Physicians use pharmaceuticals to treat the symptoms, but increased sugar consumption literally has a larger than life influence on all this. Couple this dynamic with the fact that sugar and sugar-sweetened carbs are addictive and require one to consume more and more, it's not hard to see the world has a sugar problem.

The shocking thing is that this isn't a hard conclusion to make; yet, major changes would jeopardize large businesses and agricultural subsidies and remove cheap foods sources to feed the world. The trends in food consumption have caused many other markets to spring up like pharma and healthcare focused on treating the symptoms of bad diets. Large policy debates have begun and loom for the future as we careen toward the knee-jerk solution of a plant-based approach to feed the world which does nothing to consider the unhealthy dietary consequences.
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Wed, Oct-23-19, 09:25
Ms Arielle's Avatar
Ms Arielle Ms Arielle is online now
Senior Member
Posts: 19,214
 
Plan: atkins, carnivore 2023
Stats: 200/211/163 Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: -30%
Location: Massachusetts
Default

DANDR chonicled the rise of sugar in each society to the increase of heart attacks etc. a few short decades later.
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Wed, Oct-23-19, 15:33
Bob-a-rama's Avatar
Bob-a-rama Bob-a-rama is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,961
 
Plan: Keto (Atkins Induction)
Stats: 235/175/185 Male 5' 11"
BF:
Progress: 120%
Location: Florida
Default

When considering health care costs, in the long run sugar is probably not cheap food.

When Castro took over Cuba, the sugar companies relocated to Florida. Florida has the right kind of climate, but not the right soil and other growing conditions.

Here in Florida, "Big Sugar" runs the state government to the near-death of the Everglades. I have witness a 99% decrease in wildlife in my lifetime due to the water demands and polluted output from the 3 Big Sugar companies.

Mrazek pond has about 40 acres visible from the road. In the 1970s, when the mosquito fish hatched one could stand on the shore and look out. There would be more feathers than water showing, it was noisy, it stunk of birds (a good stink IMHO), and there were plenty who couldn't even get in until another bird left. There must have been more than 2,000 birds in there, herons, egrets, woodstorks, spoonbills, limpkins, stilts, avocets and so on.

In 2019 I've never seen more than a dozen birds at a time in there.

It's a pity.

So for me, it's not only the health care cost, but the environmental cost.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Fri, Oct-25-19, 13:00
Robin120's Avatar
Robin120 Robin120 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 4,140
 
Plan: low carb
Stats: 171/125/145 Female 5'9
BF:
Progress: 177%
Location: DC
Default

Yikes!

I wonder if this is only talking about sugar (for example, not counting hfcs.....like the no sugar added cool whip uses hfcs instead of sugar ). I am guessing it is the case, because I think we consume a whole lot more than 29lbs per year compared to the 70's......
Reply With Quote
  #11   ^
Old Fri, Oct-25-19, 13:35
Ms Arielle's Avatar
Ms Arielle Ms Arielle is online now
Senior Member
Posts: 19,214
 
Plan: atkins, carnivore 2023
Stats: 200/211/163 Female 5'8"
BF:
Progress: -30%
Location: Massachusetts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob-a-rama
When considering health care costs, in the long run sugar is probably not cheap food.

When Castro took over Cuba, the sugar companies relocated to Florida. Florida has the right kind of climate, but not the right soil and other growing conditions.

Here in Florida, "Big Sugar" runs the state government to the near-death of the Everglades. I have witness a 99% decrease in wildlife in my lifetime due to the water demands and polluted output from the 3 Big Sugar companies.

Mrazek pond has about 40 acres visible from the road. In the 1970s, when the mosquito fish hatched one could stand on the shore and look out. There would be more feathers than water showing, it was noisy, it stunk of birds (a good stink IMHO), and there were plenty who couldn't even get in until another bird left. There must have been more than 2,000 birds in there, herons, egrets, woodstorks, spoonbills, limpkins, stilts, avocets and so on.

In 2019 I've never seen more than a dozen birds at a time in there.

It's a pity.

So for me, it's not only the health care cost, but the environmental cost.

Bob


Hear ya!!

Saw a program last week about a huge inland lake in Ukraine that was a source of free fish keeping a whole fleet in business plus the fisheries. It is empty-- with a few ships grounded. All the water supporting the lake was redirected to new cotton fields.

We are just trashing this earth.
Reply With Quote
  #12   ^
Old Sun, Oct-27-19, 03:32
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 14,674
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

The part that amazes me is how they not only keep the truth from the public to keep us shorn of our money; they keep the truth from themselves as well.

It's their parents with dementia and their children with Type II diabetes. They are taking statins!

We are the Dietary Resistance.
Reply With Quote
  #13   ^
Old Wed, Oct-30-19, 12:59
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,861
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Well, I don't, but even though I don't eat it, I'm buying sugar again. My hummingbirds insist!
Reply With Quote
  #14   ^
Old Fri, Nov-01-19, 20:34
Bonnie OFS Bonnie OFS is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,573
 
Plan: Dr. Bernstein
Stats: 188/150/135 Female 5 ft 4 inches
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: NE WA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy LC
Well, I don't, but even though I don't eat it, I'm buying sugar again. My hummingbirds insist!


Mine, too! When sugar goes on sale for Xmas baking, I'm going to need to buy a new bag. But the hummers are worth it for their entertainment value. I have the feeder outside the front window & it's fun to watch them. They try to drive each other off - the dominant one even sits on top of it.

But I buy a 4-lb bag once every year or two; compared to the 50-lb bags I used to buy it's just a drop in the bucket!
Reply With Quote
  #15   ^
Old Fri, Nov-01-19, 22:12
Verbena Verbena is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,056
 
Plan: My own
Stats: 186/155/150 Female 5'4"
BF:
Progress: 86%
Location: SW PNW
Default

I always feel a bit odd buying sugar for the hummers, but I know that they can handle it, while I cannot. We've had some hanging around through the winter the last few years, so I feel it is especially important to keep their feeders full.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:56.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.