Solitude is a key part of sanity for me. At work it's always made me roll my eyes that so many people (starting with HR) seem to want to make everything a sorority. And I'm ok with high-social environs -- but temporarily for goodness sake. Extended socialization seems mostly for people who cannot stand being alone... and to me that has always seemed a symptom more than an innate personality issue.
I've tried a lot of versions of 'timed eating' from just cycling carbs to fasting for a day or most of a day ongoing.
20/4 or 19/5 is easy, and I like how it seems I can eat more, sometimes more carbs, doing that, less concern about what the meal is (assuming it's good of course).
But I cannot get enough food down my throat in the time allowed, is the problem. I'm just not hungry enough to eat the amount of protein and fats I want my body to have daily, in that short a time. If I eat a lot of protein and fats, I'm not hungry for a good 8 hours... or more.
Then I end up under-eating, and then eventually it's not working for me anymore (or I'm losing weight 'yay' but feel like crap, and am probably losing more LBM than fat).
When I was young, I was a workaholic pretty young, but very active -- from early morning to night, 6-7 days a week sometimes, and I was running warehouses and many depts. in my youngest days so it was pretty physical -- and I was almost never ill. Not off work anyway. I sometimes felt ill, and naturally, I would just stop eating. My coworkers and boss would give me a hard time about it, but it just felt like the thing to do. I realized one day that my cats did this. When they were injured they stopped eating temporarily. I always felt like my body had a lot of stuff to deal with so I would eat one "solid" thing as I thought of it (usually a fat shredded-beef burrito with cheese) and then just not eat for a couple days and drink mostly water. As a variant sometimes I would eat a little raw garlic, scallions, and cheddar cheese... my coworkers thought that was even crazier lol. I don't know if it helped or not, I only knew that my immune system seemed to be really good, sickness was very rare and never held on.
Lately I've been thinking about how my body seems to have its own sort of natural cycles, and my desire to have A PLAN that is consistent tends to result in my seldom making the plan work as desired and then feeling guilty about that, on top of which it doesn't work for my body very well when I do get it right. I'm thinking about coming up with a (don't laugh) 'plan' that by its nature rather than designing a lot of food or a little food or mostly fasting or mostly eating, shifts it back and forth maybe every couple days, like a lot of protein/fats (food) for a couple days, and then very very light food for a day or two (anywhere between fasting and just 'eating very lightly'). I don't know if it will work any better than anything else but I hope it will better match the seeming tendency for food intake my body wants already.
I agree that fasting is a bit of an extreme in a way. On the other hand I think the combination of our food options, our really low sun exposure and exercise, the dramatic amount of harmful environmental toxins we live and breathe, might make more dense nutrition -- and more intense 'compensation behaviors' where needed -- a reasonable thing.
As noted by others, attempting to deal with a serious health issue -- including severe obesity but also organ issues etc. -- brings a different factor in than merely wanting to be healthier in general. Fat loss vs. maintenance would matter as well.
I love that we have a forum where people can talk about this stuff. Nobody in my offline life cares. :-)
PJ
|