Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Daily Low-Carb Support > Paleolithic & Neanderthin
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31   ^
Old Mon, Jan-11-10, 21:03
klowcarb's Avatar
klowcarb klowcarb is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 1,136
 
Plan: Zero Carb / Warrior Diet
Stats: 100/100/100 Female 5' 4"
BF:
Progress:
Location: Boston, MA
Default

I agree, Nancy. Weston Price did point out the the meat-eating tribes he came across were the healthiest. I believe the Kitvians were healthy BECAUSE of the low sugar and BECAUSE of the coconut fat and fish and DESPITE the tubers and fruit.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #32   ^
Old Tue, Jan-12-10, 10:11
capmikee's Avatar
capmikee capmikee is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 5,160
 
Plan: Weston A. Price, GFCF
Stats: 165/133/132 Male 5' 5"
BF:?/12.7%/?
Progress: 97%
Location: Philadelphia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy LC
Quote:
They get an estimated 69% of their calories from carbohydrate, 21% from fat, 17% from saturated fat and 10% from protein.
The kitavan diet was high in % of saturated fat, if I recall correctly, not necessarily super high in total fat though. So if they ate 30% of their calories in fat, that's not high. But if 85% of that 30% was saturated fat (coconut fats) then if you don't read carefully, it sounds like it is a super high fat diet.

Your point is a good one, but that's not how I interpret the numbers. I think that says that their total fat intake was 21% and their saturated fat intake was 17%, which is about 81% of the total. So their total fat intake is even lower than you estimated, but the proportion of saturated fat is indeed extremely high.
Reply With Quote
  #33   ^
Old Tue, Jan-12-10, 10:42
girlbug2's Avatar
girlbug2 girlbug2 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,091
 
Plan: Ketogenic paleo
Stats: 186/167/125 Female 5'4"
BF:trying to quit
Progress: 31%
Location: So. California
Default

When I shed my extra weight and go on maintenance, it will be a pure paleo maintenance diet. I'm thinking that as far as fruits and nuts go, there will be a few principles to follow:

1. I am from northern european ancestry, so my body is arguably adapted for that kind of climate and foods. Aside from summer berries, northern paleo peoples probably didn't have access to much fruit, so I won't be eating much fruit either.

2. Fruits have been bred and cultivated for thousands of years to be huge and super sweet. What we think of as "normal" fruits are actually mutant sugar bombs to a paleo diet. The best kind of fruit for the human body is the kind you can still find thriving in nature,e.g. the wild berries and maybe certain fruits that are native to other regions of the world, such as figs, pommegranates, wild persimmons, etc. These fruits dont' need to be grown in orchards and fertilized extensively to thrive--I think they are less "tampered with" by humans--perhaps they're the ideal fruits to eat. They tend to have lower net carbs than orchard fruits like apples, peaches, pears and grapes.

3. Greens with more color and flavor, but less sweet taste, are probably closer to what paleo peoples ate than the lettuces, celery and carrots of today. So the bulk of my veggies will be dark leafy greens like kale, spinach and turnip greens. No iceberg lettuce allowed!
Reply With Quote
  #34   ^
Old Tue, Jan-12-10, 10:47
jem51 jem51 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,731
 
Plan: Mine, all mine
Stats: 160/120/120 Female 5'6"
BF:still got some
Progress: 100%
Location: Oregon
Default

the kitavan diet was high in fiber. they were not eating refined starches. coconut is a perfect example of high fat, but also the carbohydrate has little effect of blood sugar.

it is true that modern fruit is higher in sugar, generally, but there have always been sweet fruit...maybe not so much up north (except for sweet wild berries) but in tropical areas, for sure. dates, for instance, are prehistoric. yes there are some that we created (medjools) but most are as they were.
Reply With Quote
  #35   ^
Old Tue, Jan-12-10, 10:58
capmikee's Avatar
capmikee capmikee is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 5,160
 
Plan: Weston A. Price, GFCF
Stats: 165/133/132 Male 5' 5"
BF:?/12.7%/?
Progress: 97%
Location: Philadelphia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by girlbug2
2. Fruits have been bred and cultivated for thousands of years to be huge and super sweet. What we think of as "normal" fruits are actually mutant sugar bombs to a paleo diet.

Apples and cherries actually can't be bred for sweetness at all - they are "heterosexual" plants whose offspring does not produce similar fruit to the parents. The only way to have sweet apples and cherries is to graft them - almost like a primitive form of cloning. Wikipedia says that grafting has been practiced for about 4000 years, but I think the eating of apples (as opposed to making alcoholic cider) is much more recent. This is too bad for the Paleo sweet tooth, because the apple has an extremely long season and the fruits store well, unlike berries.
Reply With Quote
  #36   ^
Old Tue, Jan-12-10, 12:45
HappyLC HappyLC is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,876
 
Plan: Generic low carb
Stats: 212/167/135 Female 66.75
BF:
Progress: 58%
Location: Long Island, NY
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Citruskiss
What does everyone here think of the idea of making the 'base' vegetables and fruit?


If you like them, feel good (or better) eating them, and are losing and not having cravings, then why not go for it? Personally, I have a bad reaction (allergic or gastro or both) to just about everything that grows in the ground, so I eat very few carbs out of necessity.
Reply With Quote
  #37   ^
Old Tue, Jan-12-10, 12:52
Citruskiss Citruskiss is offline
I've decided
Posts: 16,864
 
Plan: LC
Stats: 235/137.6/130 Female 5' 5"
BF:haven't a clue
Progress: 93%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by girlbug2
When I shed my extra weight and go on maintenance, it will be a pure paleo maintenance diet. I'm thinking that as far as fruits and nuts go, there will be a few principles to follow:

1. I am from northern european ancestry, so my body is arguably adapted for that kind of climate and foods. Aside from summer berries, northern paleo peoples probably didn't have access to much fruit, so I won't be eating much fruit either.

2. Fruits have been bred and cultivated for thousands of years to be huge and super sweet. What we think of as "normal" fruits are actually mutant sugar bombs to a paleo diet. The best kind of fruit for the human body is the kind you can still find thriving in nature,e.g. the wild berries and maybe certain fruits that are native to other regions of the world, such as figs, pommegranates, wild persimmons, etc. These fruits dont' need to be grown in orchards and fertilized extensively to thrive--I think they are less "tampered with" by humans--perhaps they're the ideal fruits to eat. They tend to have lower net carbs than orchard fruits like apples, peaches, pears and grapes.

3. Greens with more color and flavor, but less sweet taste, are probably closer to what paleo peoples ate than the lettuces, celery and carrots of today. So the bulk of my veggies will be dark leafy greens like kale, spinach and turnip greens. No iceberg lettuce allowed!


I like this - you make some very good points. Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #38   ^
Old Tue, Jan-12-10, 13:17
jem51 jem51 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,731
 
Plan: Mine, all mine
Stats: 160/120/120 Female 5'6"
BF:still got some
Progress: 100%
Location: Oregon
Default

i also have terrible gut reactions from too much produce. but really it's overeating it for the most part....a couple nights ago my x steamed a mix of broc/cauli/carrot to go w a nice chop. later in the evening i decided to finish off the leftover vegies. i certainly paid the next day.
i am down to one meal w vegies daily except for the possibility of some sauteed onion/mushroom. or possibly a tomato base stew/chili.

problem is (for some of us) that too much meat raises my BG... i would be hungry if i didn't have more volume....so i go for the vegies that don't cause BG to increase.
Reply With Quote
  #39   ^
Old Tue, Jan-12-10, 13:57
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,863
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jem51
the kitavan diet was high in fiber. they were not eating refined starches. coconut is a perfect example of high fat, but also the carbohydrate has little effect of blood sugar.

it is true that modern fruit is higher in sugar, generally, but there have always been sweet fruit...maybe not so much up north (except for sweet wild berries) but in tropical areas, for sure. dates, for instance, are prehistoric. yes there are some that we created (medjools) but most are as they were.

According to what I've read, they ate a lot of starches from tubers, maybe breadfruit too. But they were probably low in fructose.

Dr. Guyenet wrote a bunch of posts about them and their native diet.
Quote:
Like the Kuna, Kitavans straddle the line between agricultural and hunter-gatherer lifestyles. They eat a diet primarily composed of tubers (yam, sweet potato, taro and cassava), fruit, vegetables, coconut and fish, in order of calories. This is typical of traditional Pacific island cultures, although the relative amounts differ.

Very starchy stuff. Taro and cassava both are I know. Isn't cassava what they make tapioca from?
Reply With Quote
  #40   ^
Old Tue, Jan-12-10, 15:09
capmikee's Avatar
capmikee capmikee is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 5,160
 
Plan: Weston A. Price, GFCF
Stats: 165/133/132 Male 5' 5"
BF:?/12.7%/?
Progress: 97%
Location: Philadelphia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy LC
Isn't cassava what they make tapioca from?

Cassava, manioc and yuca are all the same thing. Tapioca is the flour made from the root.
Reply With Quote
  #41   ^
Old Tue, Jan-12-10, 15:14
klowcarb's Avatar
klowcarb klowcarb is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 1,136
 
Plan: Zero Carb / Warrior Diet
Stats: 100/100/100 Female 5' 4"
BF:
Progress:
Location: Boston, MA
Default

I like to get my fruits and veggies in. I eat the animals that eat them . Then I don't have to deal with the sugar and fiber and anti-nutrients.
Reply With Quote
  #42   ^
Old Tue, Jan-12-10, 15:25
HappyLC HappyLC is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,876
 
Plan: Generic low carb
Stats: 212/167/135 Female 66.75
BF:
Progress: 58%
Location: Long Island, NY
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by klowcarb
I like to get my fruits and veggies in. I eat the animals that eat them . Then I don't have to deal with the sugar and fiber and anti-nutrients.


I like that and will have to remember it next time someone tells me I need to eat fruit and veg!
Reply With Quote
  #43   ^
Old Tue, Jan-12-10, 15:34
Seejay's Avatar
Seejay Seejay is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 3,025
 
Plan: Optimal Diet
Stats: 00/00/00 Female 62 inches
BF:
Progress: 8%
Default

I minimize fruit and veg too. Condiments only. So, much as I like Mark Sisson, I still think it's a little PC to have fruits and veggies as the base - as opposed to really being needed.

Maybe for active hard gainers like Mark it's one thing. I would hate to have to gag down a Big Ass Salad every day.
Reply With Quote
  #44   ^
Old Tue, Jan-12-10, 16:12
capmikee's Avatar
capmikee capmikee is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 5,160
 
Plan: Weston A. Price, GFCF
Stats: 165/133/132 Male 5' 5"
BF:?/12.7%/?
Progress: 97%
Location: Philadelphia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by klowcarb
I like to get my fruits and veggies in. I eat the animals that eat them . Then I don't have to deal with the sugar and fiber and anti-nutrients.

Ever since my stepdad told me that "big cats in the wild eat grains because they eat the stomachs of their prey," I've been thinking about tripe, chitterlings and gizzards. Of course my stepdad was wrong, because wild ruminants hardly eat any grains. But his point is good: eating the digestive tract of an herbivore is the best way to get vegetables.
Reply With Quote
  #45   ^
Old Tue, Jan-12-10, 16:33
HappyLC HappyLC is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,876
 
Plan: Generic low carb
Stats: 212/167/135 Female 66.75
BF:
Progress: 58%
Location: Long Island, NY
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Seejay
...much as I like Mark Sisson, I still think it's a little PC to have fruits and veggies as the base - as opposed to really being needed...


I got the same feeling at MDA...that fruit and veg are the PC thing to support.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 17:27.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.