Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > Low-Carb War Zone
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #46   ^
Old Tue, Jul-19-05, 14:11
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,866
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

I don't mind long ones either, as long as the content is good and the writer uses paragraphs!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #47   ^
Old Tue, Jul-19-05, 17:24
TBoneMitch TBoneMitch is offline
OOOOOOOOOH YEAH!
Posts: 692
 
Plan: High Fat/IF
Stats: 215/170/160 Male 5 feet 10 inches
BF:27%/12%/8%
Progress: 82%
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Default

Same for me.

If the post is long it can be intimidating, but if it is well-written and interesting, I will read it with pleasure.

However, if it is all in caps with no punctuation and no paragraphs...
Reply With Quote
  #48   ^
Old Tue, Jul-19-05, 17:39
Yaberhoo's Avatar
Yaberhoo Yaberhoo is offline
Undercover Goddess
Posts: 2,751
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 360/304.2/180 Female 71 inches
BF:Half Price Special
Progress: 31%
Location: SE Washington
Default

2 much shrt hnd drvs me nts! (It hurt just to type that)
Reply With Quote
  #49   ^
Old Tue, Jul-19-05, 18:31
Lisa N's Avatar
Lisa N Lisa N is offline
Posts: 12,028
 
Plan: Bernstein Diabetes Soluti
Stats: 260/-/145 Female 5' 3"
BF:
Progress: 63%
Location: Michigan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yaberhoo
2 much shrt hnd drvs me nts! (It hurt just to type that)


You know...I've heard that there are support groups to help people get over writing like that....
Reply With Quote
  #50   ^
Old Tue, Jul-19-05, 19:50
Yaberhoo's Avatar
Yaberhoo Yaberhoo is offline
Undercover Goddess
Posts: 2,751
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 360/304.2/180 Female 71 inches
BF:Half Price Special
Progress: 31%
Location: SE Washington
Default

There's no help for me. I'm too far gone. *sigh*
Reply With Quote
  #51   ^
Old Tue, Jul-19-05, 20:06
potatofree's Avatar
potatofree potatofree is offline
Fully Caffeinated
Posts: 17,245
 
Plan: Back to Atkins
Stats: 298/228/160 Female 5ft9in
BF:?/35/?
Progress: 51%
Default

Don't look at me Yaberhoo, it took me a while to catch on to the EASY ones... I kept thinking people were sad when they typed WOE.
Reply With Quote
  #52   ^
Old Tue, Jul-19-05, 21:47
Yaberhoo's Avatar
Yaberhoo Yaberhoo is offline
Undercover Goddess
Posts: 2,751
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 360/304.2/180 Female 71 inches
BF:Half Price Special
Progress: 31%
Location: SE Washington
Default

LOL! I don't mind the occasional WOE/WOL stuff. It's when they start dropping all the vowels or use numbers (i.e. ate = 8). Of course, this from the person who started the infamous "eople" episode.
Reply With Quote
  #53   ^
Old Tue, Jul-19-05, 22:09
ysabella's Avatar
ysabella ysabella is offline
Don't Call Me Sugar
Posts: 4,209
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 293/287/230 Female 65 inches
BF: :^( :^| :^)
Progress: 10%
Location: Auburn, WA
Default Squirrels

I DON'T ENJOY THE ALL CAPS MESSAGES.

When you write enormous posts, you have to assume that some people won't read all the way through. It's like writing technical documentation - when I have to do that, I tend to write wacky things, or use wacky examples (usually involving squirrels or sci-fi references), because then people are more inclined to keep reading.

My husband likes to argue politics online but he does tend to write enormous, optic-nerve-numbing posts. They are incredibly informative and usually pleasant to read, but sometimes the sheer size just makes people skip 'em. So if you want to be persuasive, I think it pays to be concise.
Reply With Quote
  #54   ^
Old Wed, Jul-20-05, 07:17
Dodger's Avatar
Dodger Dodger is offline
Posts: 8,767
 
Plan: Paleoish/Keto
Stats: 225/167/175 Male 71.5 inches
BF:18%
Progress: 116%
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Default

I tend to only browse through long posts. I would much prefer to read four shorts posts than one long one.
Reply With Quote
  #55   ^
Old Wed, Jul-20-05, 13:16
potatofree's Avatar
potatofree potatofree is offline
Fully Caffeinated
Posts: 17,245
 
Plan: Back to Atkins
Stats: 298/228/160 Female 5ft9in
BF:?/35/?
Progress: 51%
Default

Before anyone says you just don't want to apply yourself, are looking for the easy way out, etc.

Content is the main factor in whether a looooong post is going to be read, for me anyway. If it's a full page of dead-horse-beating as opposed to a story about someone's struggles, I'll skip it. My loss, sometimes, I'm sure... because there's maybe some good info in there. When it comes to feelings, it's sometimes necessary to ramble a bit. I find, personally, that I learn more about people when they let it all go and ramble a bit.

I realize some people are passionate and/or a tad bit overzealous about how they eat. Again, I have to wonder WHY people feel the need to hammer out a longwinded lecture admonishing people for not "DOING IT RIGHT"!

I don't get the appeal, personally, of trying to make yourself responsible for "saving" anyone by trying to make SURE they know YOU HAVE THE ANSWERS. Going from thread to thread to preach the Gospel of Your Way, going, IMO, a bit far in warning newcomers about potential pitfalls, to the point of scaring some of them off... then declaring they just want to take the easy way out, weren't dedicated enough, or JUST WON'T LISTEN!!! <sigh> Is it just being overly concerned? Codependent? Ego-driven? I honestly want to know.

<end manifesto>
Reply With Quote
  #56   ^
Old Wed, Jul-20-05, 13:47
WyoDiva's Avatar
WyoDiva WyoDiva is offline
Clueless. ODAAT.
Posts: 10,845
 
Plan: Intuitive Eating
Stats: 290.6/290.6/180 Female 5'10"
BF:I do not care!
Progress: 0%
Location: Helena Montana USA
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by potatofree
I don't get the appeal, personally, of trying to make yourself responsible for "saving" anyone by trying to make SURE they know YOU HAVE THE ANSWERS. Going from thread to thread to preach the Gospel of Your Way, going, IMO, a bit far in warning newcomers about potential pitfalls, to the point of scaring some of them off... then declaring they just want to take the easy way out, weren't dedicated enough, or JUST WON'T LISTEN!!! <sigh> Is it just being overly concerned? Codependent? Ego-driven? I honestly want to know.

<end manifesto>

You said it well, PotatoFree...'nuff said...lol
Reply With Quote
  #57   ^
Old Wed, Jul-20-05, 14:16
scthgharpy's Avatar
scthgharpy scthgharpy is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,958
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 254/215/150 Female 64"
BF:C198/T126/H53/L120
Progress: 38%
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Default

I appreciate the longer posts as well-but maybe the solution is to, if you find yourself writing a disseration, post it to your personal journal or website, and just post the url. save the server space!
Reply With Quote
  #58   ^
Old Wed, Jul-20-05, 16:13
tom sawyer tom sawyer is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,241
 
Plan: Atkins-like
Stats: 215/170/170 Male 70
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Hannibal MO
Default

You say that what works for one person may not work for another. Makes it sound like we are all entirely different organisms needing vastly different substrates for existence.

I will go out on a limb here, and say that we are all the same species and have the same metabolic pathways running along in our bodies. And some form of low carb IS the right way to feed our bodies without abusing our metabolic pathways. So PLEASE don't tell me that low carb doesn't work for you, because it sure as heck WILL! And it is likely to take a LONG TIME to undo that which is the result of a long period of nutritional abuse.

I'll stop before my post gets too long...
Reply With Quote
  #59   ^
Old Wed, Jul-20-05, 16:41
bluesmoke bluesmoke is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 521
 
Plan: Atkins+
Stats: 386/285/200 Male 5'11"
BF:
Progress: 54%
Default

I agree with Tom Sawyer here, the only variation I see is the amount of carbs one can handle. In my case my carbs have to be kept very low with no grains, legumes, sugar etc. I even can have a reaction to sugar alcohols. However, I am older and have a long history of screwed up eating. Nyah Levi
Reply With Quote
  #60   ^
Old Wed, Jul-20-05, 16:52
TBoneMitch TBoneMitch is offline
OOOOOOOOOH YEAH!
Posts: 692
 
Plan: High Fat/IF
Stats: 215/170/160 Male 5 feet 10 inches
BF:27%/12%/8%
Progress: 82%
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Default

I agree 100% with Tom Sawyer and Bluesmoke.

The reasons (in my humble opinion) why some people seem to take low carb like ducks to water while some seem to struggle are twofold:

1) as Tom said, the more nutritional abuse your body has had to deal with, the slower and longer the habituation to a new, proper way of nutrition will be.

2) Fear of fat. In my mind, avoiding saturated fats while lowcarbing is almost a ticket to failure. Of course, the goal is not to FORCE DOWN fat, but rather to go with fats you like and in the quantities necessary for you to kill cravings and feel full.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 20:29.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.