Thu, Mar-24-05, 12:01
|
|
Registered Member
Posts: 82
|
|
Plan: A mix of this and that...
Stats: 160/160/130
BF:T/&/A
Progress: 0%
Location: Canada
|
|
I deduct the fiber. I get to eat more veggies that way. If you deduct the fiber just so you can eat questionable things, then the whole point of LCing is lost.
I was deducting the SA's.... but in the "Atkins ice cream is evil" thread, tagcaver had this to say:
Quote:
Here's the scoop (pun intended) on sugar-alcohol containing ice cream: Sugar alcohols are hygroscopic -- water is attracted to them much like table salt left out on a humid day. In the intestines, if not digested*, they will attract lots of water molecules, making your stool very loose and watery and, um, well, explosive.
* Some people digest sugar alcohols, and the body treats them just like other carbohydrates. They have the enzyme to do this, and the molecule is changed, thus destroying its hygroscopic effect, and the, um, aftereffects. These people should count all the carbs listed for sugar alcohols.
Other people lack this enzyme (genetics, just like some people can curl their tongue and others can't, or why some people have blue eyes and others brown eyes). The people who lack the enzyme send the sugar alcohol molecules through their body unchanged and rather rapidly, also. These people can probably ignore all sugar alcohol carbs, but should not go out in public after consuming these molecules.
A sugar alcohol, by the way, is a regular sugar molecule that has been reduced by hydrogen atoms and an enzyme, and the terminal carbonyl group has been changed to a hydroxyl (alcohol) group, so there's only one hydrogen atom different between the two. Otherwise they're very similar.
|
So now I'm not counting them - I'm endeavouring to keep them out of my body period. Ick!
|