Fri, Dec-10-10, 08:28
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 15,075
|
|
Plan: mostly milkfat
Stats: 190/152.4/154
BF:
Progress: 104%
Location: Ontario
|
|
I'd say just make sure you're getting your electrolytes in, and see what happens. All that exercise plus potassium/sodium wasting from the diet change=bad.
I'm a little agnostic about cyclic ketogenic diets. It's harder to build muscle on a lower-calorie diet, increased appetite during the carb-up is a possible confounder. Traditional Inuit didn't look like professional bodybuilders, but they did manage to have muscles. It's sort of a hard thing to prove. A three-month study might show greater increase in muscle mass with a high-carb diet vs a low-carb diet, but it might take a longer-term study to see at what point the two eating groups muscle mass plateaus. It's also kind of hard for people to act as their own controls in this sort of study, once they've gained muscle on one regime, they're just plain different. I guess the next best thing would be an identical twin study.
Jeff Volek's done a few studies, one with men and one with women. He found that it was possible to gain muscle on a low carb diet. I think that was in untrained individuals. I can't find the actual studies right now, they're not on PubMed.
I've considered going on a cyclic ketogenic diet, but years of eating very low carb has left me with very little appetite for carb.
|