Tue, Sep-07-10, 08:17
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 2,715
|
|
Plan: atkins/hcg
Stats: 228/162/135
BF:
Progress: 71%
Location: North Dakota
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hairballz
For what it's worth, I've looked at the holding on versus not holding on question quite a bit, and the consensus seems to be that holding on DOES indeed reduce the effectiveness of the workout, but to a degree that doesn't really matter - if I recall correctly it's something like less than 10% difference in calories burned holding on versus not holding on. I have TERRIBLE balance, so if I'm walking on a treadmill I have to hold on or I find myself wandering off either side. Even when I'm running on the treadmill and not holding on, I have to fight my tendency to run off to the left (it has to do with the way my right leg naturally swings inward in my stride). I used to obsess about "cheating myself" by holding on when walking, but when I actually looked into it/researched it and found it had so little difference, I quit caring about it.
One caution, though, I did read that holding on, particularly at some speed, does place an additional strain on your lower back, but if you have a strong enough core it shouldn't bother you. I've actually found holding on increased my strength in my shoulders/arms over time - not as good as a shoulder/arm weight training regimen, but enough to notice.
|
I am really bad with my balance also - I too always wonder to the sides and I know they say don't watch tv but really that is the only way I will get on my treadmill is to watch my tv shows that I don't watch otherwise - kinda gives me motivation. I have been trying to do it without hanging on and I have found it seems harder so my incline is at just 1% instead of the 5.5% before but I am trying to increase my speed. I read somewhere (I need to stop reading) HA HA that you should be doing 4 miles in 1 hr before I would only be doing 3 miles - that is hard also UGH
|