Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Sun, Jan-21-24, 10:23
Demi's Avatar
Demi Demi is offline
Posts: 26,768
 
Plan: Muscle Centric
Stats: 238/153/160 Female 5'10"
BF:
Progress: 109%
Location: UK
Default Blue Zones Website Misrepresents Diets

In her latest post Dr Cate Shanahan, author of Deep Nutrition discusses the Blue Zones book. Apparently doctors who want to learn more about nutrition are told the book is backed up by science. But, as she says, is it really?

Quote:
Blue Zones Website Misrepresents Diets

The Blue Zones book was a huge phenomenon when it first came out, and its influence is still growing. Released in 2008, it describes the diets of four geographic regions with a disproportionately high percentage of people older than 100. But it wasn’t the scientific endeavor many believe it to be.

Dan Buettner, the author, is a journalist. He interviewed several scientists, but the book was not scientifically vetted in any way. The bigger issue is that the Seventh Day Adventist church paid for his travels and likely designed and edited the book, as well.

If you don’t already know, the Adventist church advocates for a mostly vegetarian diet. As a result of this bias, the Blue Zones book is full of contradictory content of the kind you would expect when a journalist reports what he saw, and a biased editor tries to make those observations fit his or her worldview. The result of this square-peg-round-hole relationship is that the big, bold recommendations at the end of the chapters conflict with the content within the chapters.

Read the article in full here.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:03.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.