Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Mon, Feb-04-02, 14:56
IslandGirl's Avatar
IslandGirl IslandGirl is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 4,909
 
Plan: Atkins,PP - wgt in %
Stats: 100/96.8/69 Female 5'6.5"
BF:DWTK/DDare/JEnuf
Progress: 10%
Location: Vancouver Island, BC
Default Recent Study Validates Effectiveness of Low-Carb Diets

from http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/418266_6

Conference Report - North American Association for the Study of Obesity from Medscape Diabetes & Endocrinology

Low-Carbohydrate, High-Protein Diets
Physicians are often asked about the safety and efficacy of low-carbohydrate, high-protein diets. Unfortunately, very few controlled studies have evaluated these popular regimens. These diets, which are often high in fat, raise concerns about their effects on lipid levels. One such diet, the Atkins Diet, restricts carbohydrates and encourages unlimited consumption of protein and fat.

Preliminary results were presented from a 3-center (University of Pennsylvania, University of Colorado, Washington University) randomized controlled trial comparing the Atkins Diet with a conventional low-fat, high-carbohydrate plan that restricted daily caloric intake to 1200-1500 kcal for women and 1500-1800 kcal for men.[10] The study included 63 obese (BMI 33.8 ± 3.4 kg/m2) males and females who were randomized to 1 of the 2 diets. Subjects received an initial session with a dietitian to explain the assigned diet program. At 12 weeks, the researchers found that the Atkins group had a lower rate of attrition (12%) compared with that of the conventional program (30%). In addition, subjects in the Atkins group lost significantly more weight (8.5 ± 3.7%) compared with the conventional group (3.7 ± 4.0%). In terms of serum lipids, the Atkins group demonstrated slight increases in total cholesterol (TC; 2.2 ± 16.6%) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (6.6 ± 20.7%), whereas the conventional group showed significant decreases in these measures (TC -8.2 ± 11.5%; LDL -11.1 ± 19.4%). High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol significantly increased in the Atkins group (11.5 ± 20.6%) but did not change in the conventional group, whereas triglycerides showed a significant decrease for the Atkins group (-21.7 ± 27.9%) and no change in the conventional group. At 26 weeks, these changes persisted in both groups even though the sample size was smaller. The researchers concluded that the Atkins Diet produced favorable effects on weight, HDL, triglycerides, and retention compared with a conventional low-fat, low-calorie program, whereas the conventional plan was associated with more favorable effects on TC and LDL cholesterol.

A similar randomized-controlled trial from Duke University was also presented at the conference.[11] The researchers in this study also compared the effects of a low-carbohydrate (LC) diet with a low-fat, low-calorie (LF) program. This study included 120 obese (mean BMI 34 kg/m2) males and females, who all received group treatment for their respective diet programs. At 6 months, both groups had similar rates of attrition, but the LC group lost considerably more weight (13.3 ± 4.6%) compared with the LF group (8.6 ± 5.9%). In addition, the LC group lost significantly more fat mass than the LF group (-9.7 kg for the LC group and -6.4 kg for the LF group). Both groups showed decreases in triglycerides, with the LF group also showing a significant decrease in total cholesterol (-13.5 mg/dL). The LC group showed significant increases in HDL and a significant decrease in Chol/HDL ratio. This pattern of results was similar to those of the 3-center study described above. Longer-term studies are needed to more fully evaluate the safety and efficacy of these popular diet approaches.

The 2002 NAASO meeting will occur in San Diego, California, from February 23 as part of the First Annual Nutrition Week Conference.

Oy, should be VERY interesting, this upcoming 2002 NAASO meeting. I'll be keeping an eye out for any news.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Mon, Feb-04-02, 17:16
razzle razzle is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,193
 
Plan: mostly paleo
Stats: //
BF:also don't care
Progress: 100%
Location: West Coast, USA
Default

great post! thanks for the info.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Mon, Feb-04-02, 17:18
tamarian's Avatar
tamarian tamarian is offline
Forum Founder
Posts: 19,570
 
Plan: Atkins/PP/BFL
Stats: 400/223/200 Male 5 ft 11
BF:37%/17%/12%
Progress: 89%
Location: Ottawa, ON
Default

Nice find! I was waiting for this one, announced in last year's meating.

Wa'il
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Sat, Feb-09-02, 19:42
tamarian's Avatar
tamarian tamarian is offline
Forum Founder
Posts: 19,570
 
Plan: Atkins/PP/BFL
Stats: 400/223/200 Male 5 ft 11
BF:37%/17%/12%
Progress: 89%
Location: Ottawa, ON
Default

Found out some more information, there will be four different papers on the topic. Here's the list:

http://www.lowcarb.ca/articlesb/article338.html

Wa'il
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Sun, Feb-10-02, 18:27
Gemma Gemma is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 98
 
Plan: Protein Power
Stats: 235/193/128
BF:
Progress: 39%
Location: Victoria, Australia
Talking It has happened to me!

I loved reading this report as the lowering of triglycerides and raising of HDL have been my experience! Last blood test I had, I was really pleased with the big drop in tri's as well as a big improvement in my HDL level. I have been on PP for five months. Last time I dieted (LF), my LDL came down a little, but along with that my HDL dropped significantly which was worrying. Not so now however! Like the report, I find this WOE so much easier to maintain than any other diet I have tried - it truly is a WOL not a diet!


Has anyone else had similar results?

Gemma
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Mon, Feb-11-02, 12:24
nottoofat nottoofat is offline
New Member
Posts: 10
 
Plan: Atkins diet 2nd phase
Stats: 206/192/189
BF:
Progress: 82%
Location: Oklahoma City
Thumbs up

Great and encouraging information. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Wed, Feb-20-02, 14:12
Brave Brave is offline
New Member
Posts: 18
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 173/165/140
BF:
Progress: 24%
Location: Northeast
Smile Positive post

Thank you so much for this positive post. I hate reading the ones that are so down on lcing. It makes me a little more uncertain, because I'm still new at this. I get a little scared that I may be doing something unhealthy. These kind of posts make all the difference

Thank you, Thank you......
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Sun, Feb-24-02, 09:10
John2001's Avatar
John2001 John2001 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 278
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 290/210/199 Male 6ft 1
BF:
Progress: 88%
Location: East Coast - CT, USA
Thumbs up Same good results here too

Thanks for the post / info. I've had the same good results w/blood tests.

A freind of mine noticed my veins in my arms showing a lot. Like 4-7 noticable veins popping out, down the length of my arms. He suggested I get myself tested. (Him thinking "all" we eat is red meat on this WOL) But it worried me, so I had the test done.
Chol=180, tri's in the basement, LDL / HDL all below the mark too.

Feeling great, lots of energy, not going hungry while loosing weight, and good LDL/HDL too. How can you not go with this WOL, to lose the weight!

Cheers, John
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Thu, Feb-28-02, 09:34
cocoabear cocoabear is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 35
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 128/114/114
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: Lincolnshire - UK
Default

I think I will email that to the next person that says "Ooh your'e not on that dangerous diet are you?"
It's nice to have some research to back up what we already know!

Cocoabear
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Mon, Mar-04-02, 10:26
clwydd clwydd is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 153
 
Plan: Protein Power
Stats: 285/234/160
BF:
Progress: 41%
Location: Halifax
Default

Did anyone see any news reports about this? Of course, coming in the middle of the Olympics the timing was bad. But still I can't help thinking that if they had announced some new wonder drug for weight loss or had said that low carb will kill you, it would have been item number 4 on the news at 11.

Susan
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Did the Atkins Diet Really Kill Dr. Atkins?" gotbeer LC Research/Media 7 Mon, Apr-18-05 18:25
Carbohydrates Without Fear PacNW LC Research/Media 8 Mon, May-17-04 08:01
Atkins Research Update tamarian LC Research/Media 0 Fri, Nov-08-02 18:30
New Study on CLA tamarian LC Research/Media 0 Tue, Jul-24-01 11:26


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:12.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.