Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low Carb Health & Technical Forums > Nutrition & Supplements
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Tue, Nov-06-07, 05:05
kebaldwin kebaldwin is offline
Thank you Dr Atkins!
Posts: 4,146
 
Plan: Atkins induction
Stats: 311/250/220 Male 6 feet
BF:45%/20%/15%
Progress: 67%
Location: North Carolina
Default Inositol protects DNA from radiation

Inositol protects DNA from radiation

Research reported on November 5, 2007 at the American Association for Cancer Research Centennial Conference on Translational Cancer Medicine indicates that inositol as well as inositol hexaphosphate (IP6) helps protect the body’s genetic material from the damaging effects of ultraviolet B (UVB) and other radiation. University of Maryland School of Medicine professor of pathology Abulkalam M. Shamsuddin, MD reported that these antioxidant nutrients protect the cells’ DNA from radiation-generated free radicals. In addition to providing protection from UVB, inositol could be used to help decrease the side effects of cancer radiation therapy by increasing the treatment’s potency against malignant cells while protecting those that are healthy.

In one experiment, Dr Shamsuddin’s team treated human skin cells known as keratinocytes with IP6 while leaving others untreated before irradiating them with UVB. Treated cells were less likely to undergo genetically programmed self-destruction (apoptosis), indicating that they had less irreparable DNA damage. Dr Shamsuddin explained that the cells treated with IP6 take an extended pause at the point in their life cycle where DNA is repaired before cell division.

“IP6 certainly has some interactivity with DNA, but how exactly it works to repair DNA is still something of a mystery,” he said. “There are reports that IP6 binds with DNA repair molecule Ku to bring about the repair process. More importantly, we still don’t know how IP6 can appear to help healthy cells live while also enhancing the ability of radiation to kill cancer cells.”

In another experiment, the researchers gave drinking water containing two percent IP6 to part of a group of mice genetically engineered to have an increased risk of developing skin cancer. Tumors developed in 23 percent of these mice compared with 51 percent of those who did not receive IP6, and the number of tumors in the mice that received IP6 was half that of the untreated animals.

In yet another experiment, a cream containing inositol and IP6 helped to protect against the development of tumors in mice exposed to UVB radiation equivalent to sun exposure. “Both of these potent antioxidants have been shown to have broad-spectrum antitumor capabilities, and now our studies confirm the degree to which these molecules protect against the DNA-damaging effects of ionizing radiation,” Dr Shamsuddin stated. “Radiation damage is radiation damage, regardless of the source, so there could also be a protective role for IP6 in any form of radiation exposure, whether it is from a therapeutic dose or from solar, cosmic or nuclear sources.”

“It is possible that people regularly exposed to ionizing radiation, such as airline pilots, frequent fliers or people who handle radioactive materials, might take IP6 prophylactically to prevent possible long term effects of exposure,” he added. “It could also be advisable to use IP6 plus inositol as a cautionary treatment following a nuclear disaster or dirty bomb.”


Health Concern

Skin aging

Although there are many diseases that can affect the skin, the most common problems that we all have are the effects of our exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun over time. In the last 10 years, with the changes in the ozone layer in the upper atmosphere, it is clear that the effects of UV radiation from the sun are much more dangerous than originally thought. There are many causes for the accumulated cellular damage in the skin that we call aging. Among these are the oxidative processes and related free radical damage that result from UV sunlight, smog, toxins, cigarette smoke, X-rays, drugs, and other stressors. Young skin is also exposed to these potentially damaging changes, but when we are young, there is sufficient cellular energy (ATP) for DNA repair and cell renewal. Enzymes that provide antioxidant activity such as SOD and catalase are readily available. As we age, there is increased wear and tear, while at the same time the energy for cell repair and renewal is diminished and the antioxidant enzymes are less available.

Human studies have demonstrated pronounced protective effects of antioxidants when applied topically before UV radiation exposure. With respect to UVB-induced skin damage, the photoprotective effects of antioxidants are significant. Topical application of such combinations may result in a sustained antioxidant capacity of the skin, possibly due to antioxidant synergisms. Free radicals are culprits behind UVA-induced skin alterations, thus indicating a basis for topical antioxidant administration. In a human study, topical application of antioxidants resulted in diminished severity of UVA-induced sun damage. Thus, regular application of skin care products containing antioxidants may be of the utmost benefit in efficiently preparing skin against exogenous oxidative stressors occurring during daily life. Sunscreen agents may also benefit from combination with antioxidants resulting in increased safety and efficacy of such photoprotective products (Dreher et al. 2001).

http://www.lef.org/protocols/prtcl-099.shtml

http://www.lef.org/newsletter/2007/2007_11_06.htm
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Tue, Nov-06-07, 05:07
kebaldwin kebaldwin is offline
Thank you Dr Atkins!
Posts: 4,146
 
Plan: Atkins induction
Stats: 311/250/220 Male 6 feet
BF:45%/20%/15%
Progress: 67%
Location: North Carolina
Default

1. Sun burn is not near as bad after low carbing than before

2. I use a skin lotion of antioxidants from reviva labs that is great for sun burn. Saturday I was out in the direct sun all day, got burnt, put the lotion on once on Sunday morning and this (Monday) morning - you wouldn't even know it.

3. I also use some skin creams to help tighten loose skin.

4. I wouldn't say that changes in our environment are the biggest causes of damage to our skins - I would say changes to our diet and nutrition. People eat a lot more crap today and they eat a lot less antioxidants.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 16:16.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.