Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Tue, Dec-17-02, 18:10
doreen T's Avatar
doreen T doreen T is offline
Forum Founder
Posts: 37,232
 
Plan: LC, GF
Stats: 241/188/140 Female 165 cm
BF:
Progress: 52%
Location: Eastern ON, Canada
Default Study finds statin cholesterol drug does not cut deaths

Last Updated: 2002-12-17 9:39:40 -0400 (Reuters Health)

By Merritt McKinney

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Study after study has shown that cholesterol-lowering drugs called statins can prevent heart attacks, but in a new trial the statin pravastatin (Pravachol) did not reduce the risk of death and heart disease in people with moderately high cholesterol and high blood pressure.

But the results of the study do not mean that pravastatin or other statins cannot prevent heart disease, the study's lead author told Reuters Health.

In an interview, Dr. Barry R. Davis explained that pravastatin was effective at lowering cholesterol in a wide range of people in the study. But participants who did not take the statin but who instead received "usual care"--which could also include cholesterol-lowering medication--also experienced a drop in cholesterol, said Davis, who is at the University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center. The differences in how much cholesterol dropped in each group "were not big enough" to show an effect on heart disease and other clinical outcomes, Davis said.

Statins' record in clinical trials is impressive, but many groups of people, including women, older people, racial and ethnic minorities and people with diabetes, were not adequately represented in earlier studies. The new study, which drew participants from a larger study of treatments for high blood pressure, was designed to see how well a statin could prevent deaths in a wide variety of people.

The study included more than 10,000 people who were at least 55 years old and who had moderately high cholesterol and high blood pressure. Participants were randomly assigned to take pravastatin or to receive the "usual care" recommended by their physician. This care could include cholesterol-lowering drugs, but this was discouraged unless a person's health took a turn for the worse.

For lowering cholesterol, pravastatin was a success, according to a report in the December 18th issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association. Four years after the study began, total cholesterol had dropped 17% in people taking the statin and about 8% in the usual care group. And at the same time, testing of a random sample of participants showed that levels of LDL, the "bad" type of cholesterol, had dropped nearly 28% in the pravastatin group and 11% in the usual care group.

In a bit of encouraging news, Davis said, pravastatin lowered cholesterol in a wide range of people, regardless of age, sex, race or history of diabetes.

It is well known that lowering LDL cholesterol can reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke, but the study showed that people taking pravastatin were no less likely to die or develop heart disease than people receiving usual care.

These results do not mean that pravastatin does not provide clinical benefits, though, Davis said. He explained that during the course of the study, several other research teams reported studies demonstrating the powerful cholesterol-lowering effects of statins. Because of the increased awareness of statins, people in the usual care group were prescribed the cholesterol-lowering drugs "much more than we anticipated," Davis said.

The Houston researcher pointed out that cholesterol levels also dropped in the usual care group, although not as much as in people specifically assigned to take statins. Unlike in other statin trials, many of which compared the drugs to an inactive placebo, the difference may not have been big enough to detect any clinical benefits, Davis said.

The study was sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, but it also received funding from Pfizer. AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb, which makes pravastatin, donated medications used in the study.

"Physicians might be tempted to conclude that this large study demonstrates that statins do not work," according to Dr. Richard C. Pasternak, of Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts. "However, it is well known that they do," he concludes in an editorial that accompanies the study.

What may have happened, according to Pasternak, is that the drugs may not be as effective in ordinary settings as they are in clinical trials where participants are carefully selected and followed closely.

Pasternak has served as a consultant to or on the advisory boards of several pharmaceutical companies, including Bristol-Myers Squibb. In addition, he has received funding from Merck-Medco and has served on the speakers bureau for several drug makers.

Bristol-Myers Squibb was not available for comment at press time.

SOURCE: Journal of the American Medical Association 2002;288:1998-3007,3042-3044.


http://www.reutershealth.com/archiv...217elin002.html
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Tue, Dec-17-02, 18:57
bluesmoke bluesmoke is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 521
 
Plan: Atkins+
Stats: 386/285/200 Male 5'11"
BF:
Progress: 54%
Default

Physicians might be tempted to conclude that this large study demonstrates that statins do not work," according to Dr. Richard C. Pasternak, of Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts. "However, it is well known that they do," he concludes in an editorial that accompanies the study.





While the biggest and most comprehensive study of the drugs doesn't seem to show much, if any, benefit, they really really really do work says the paid lackey of the drug company.
Nyah Levi
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Thu, Dec-19-02, 08:17
Sheldon's Avatar
Sheldon Sheldon is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 411
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 174/163/163 Male 5 feet 7 inches
BF:21.1%/18.5%/18.5%
Progress: 100%
Location: Conway, AR
Default

Statins do lower LDL and might lower the risk of CHD. But it does not follow that statins lower the risk of CHD by lowering LDL. Without further evidence, that would be the logical fallacy known as post hoc ergo propter hoc (after this, therefore because of this).

Dr. Kendrick's article presents powerful evidence that statins apparently cut CHD risk by means other than lowering LDL. He spells out the evidence in his article.

By the way, when you look at the absolute risk, rather than relative risk, statins, however they work, don't cut the risk of CHD all that much--even in the studies that purport to show a big reduction.

Sheldon
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Thu, Dec-19-02, 08:24
Sheldon's Avatar
Sheldon Sheldon is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 411
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 174/163/163 Male 5 feet 7 inches
BF:21.1%/18.5%/18.5%
Progress: 100%
Location: Conway, AR
Default Re: Study finds statin cholesterol drug does not cut deaths

Quote:
Originally posted by doreen T
The differences in how much cholesterol dropped in each group "were not big enough" to show an effect on heart disease and other clinical outcomes, Davis said.

...Four years after the study began, total cholesterol had dropped 17% in people taking the statin and about 8% in the usual care group. And at the same time, testing of a random sample of participants showed that levels of LDL, the "bad" type of cholesterol, had dropped nearly 28% in the pravastatin group and 11% in the usual care group.


This undermines the cholesterol-heart disease hypothesis. The signficant differences in the drops in LDL should have been reflected in the differences in the rates of heart disease between the two groups. That they were not reflected is a severe problem for the theory that LDL causes heart disease.

Sheldon
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Common Myths About Low Carbohydrate Diets" gotbeer LC Research/Media 3 Sun, Feb-22-04 14:30
Slam dunk, over 100 stories today in the media, re AHA research validating Atkins an tamarian LC Research/Media 10 Tue, Jun-17-03 07:27
AAAAARRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHH!!!! r.mines Cholesterol, Heart Disease 23 Sat, Nov-30-02 11:05
Heart Study: Inflammation twice as bad as cholesterol Kristine LC Research/Media 0 Wed, Nov-13-02 20:04
Against Statins Voyajer Cholesterol, Heart Disease 4 Sun, Oct-20-02 18:22


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.