![Old](images/statusicon/post_old.gif)
Fri, Apr-23-04, 14:40
|
![RoseTattoo's Avatar](customavatars/avatar31892_0.gif) |
Kid R
Posts: 1,168
|
|
Plan: Maintenance
Stats: //
BF:Too darn much!
Progress: 90%
Location: PA
|
|
Yes, while people taking statins do need to be monitored initially for muscle damage, that condition occurs very rarely. Also, after six-nine months of monitoring, the testing can be more sporadic, since if trouble is going to occur, it usually happens at the start of taking statins.
Sure, we might find out in five or ten years that there are long term effects from these drugs, just as we've now discovered about, say, the high dose birth control pills that were commonly prescribed in the '60's. But right now, statins are considered the gold standard for lowering cholesterol if it can't be done through diet or exercise alone. They also appear to work in helping people avoid the cognitive decline that often accompanies old age. I've seen my grandmother, mother, and aunts deteriorate dreadfully from strokes and Alzheimer's caused by high cholesterol. I think I'll take my chances with the statins. I only wish I'd started earlier.
|