Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Tue, Jan-13-04, 18:51
bvtaylor's Avatar
bvtaylor bvtaylor is offline
There and Back Again
Posts: 1,590
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 200/194.4/140 Female 5'3"
BF:42%/42%/20%
Progress: 9%
Location: Northern Colorado
Unhappy (Low Carb) Ancestral Diet Gone Toxic - The Inuit

Ancestral Diet Gone Toxic

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=sto...toxic&printer=1

Tue Jan 13,11:20 AM ET

Top Stories - Los Angeles Times

By Marla Cone, Times Staff Writer

QAANAAQ, Greenland — Pitching a makeshift tent on the sea ice, where the Arctic Ocean meets the North Atlantic, brothers Mamarut and Gedion Kristiansen are ready to savor their favorite meal.

Nearby lies the carcass of a narwhal, a reclusive beast with an ivory tusk like a unicorn's. Mamarut slices off a piece of muktuk, the whale's raw pink blubber and mottled gray skin, as a snack.

"Peqqinnartoq," he says in Greenlandic. Healthy food.

Mamarut's wife, Tukummeq Peary, a descendant of famed North Pole explorer Adm. Robert E. Peary, is boiling the main entree on a camp stove. The family dips hunting knives into the kettle, pulling out steaming ribs of freshly killed ringed seal and devouring the hearty meat with some hot black tea.

Living closer to the North Pole than to any city, factory or farm, the Kristiansens appear unscathed by any industrial-age ills. They live much as their ancestors did, relying on foods harvested from the sea and skills honed by generations of Inuit.

But as northbound winds carry toxic remnants of faraway lands to their hunting grounds in extraordinary amounts, their close connection to the environment and their ancestral diet of marine mammals have left the Arctic's indigenous people vulnerable to the pollutants of modern society. About 200 hazardous compounds, which migrate from industrialized regions and accumulate in ocean-dwelling animals, have been detected in the inhabitants of the far north.

The bodies of Arctic people, particularly Greenland's Inuit, contain the highest human concentrations of industrial chemicals and pesticides found anywhere on Earth — levels so extreme that the breast milk and tissues of some Greenlanders could be classified as hazardous waste.

Nearly all Inuit tested in Greenland and more than half in Canada have levels of PCBs and mercury exceeding international health guidelines.

Perched atop a contaminated food chain, the inhabitants of the Arctic have become the industrialized world's lab rats, the involuntary subjects of an accidental human experiment demonstrating what can happen when a heaping brew of chemicals builds up in human bodies.

Studies of infants in Greenland and Arctic Canada who have been exposed in the womb and through breast milk suggest that the chemicals are harming children. Babies suffer greater rates of infections because their immune systems seem to be impaired, and their brain development is altered, slightly reducing their intelligence and memory skills.

Scientists say the immune suppression could be responsible, at least in part, for the Arctic's inordinate number of sick babies. They believe the neurological damage to newborns is similar in scope to the harm done if the mothers drank moderate amounts of alcohol while pregnant.

The tragedy for the Inuit is that they have few, if any, ways to protect themselves. Many Arctic natives say that abandoning their traditional foods would destroy a 4,000-year-old society rooted in hunting.

In this hostile and isolated expanse of glacier-carved bedrock and frozen sea, survival means that people live as marine mammals live, hunting like they do, wearing their skins. No factory-engineered fleece compares with the warmth of a sealskin parka, mittens and boots. No motorboat sneaks up on a whale like a handmade kayak latched together with rope. No snowmobile flexes with the ice like a dog-pulled sledge crafted of driftwood.

And no imported food nourishes their bodies, warms their spirit and strengthens their hearts like the flesh they slice from the flanks of a whale or seal.

"Our foods do more than nourish our bodies. They feed our souls," said the late Ingmar Egede, a Greenlandic educator who promoted the rights of indigenous peoples. "When many things in our lives are changing, our foods remain the same. They make us feel the same as they have for generations.

"When I eat Inuit foods, I know who I am."



Unexpected Poisons



In 1987, Dr. Eric Dewailly, an epidemiologist at Laval University in Quebec, was surveying contaminants in breast milk of mothers near the industrialized, heavily polluted Gulf of St. Lawrence when he met a midwife from Nunavik, the Arctic portion of Quebec province. She asked whether he wanted to gather milk samples from women there. Dewailly reluctantly agreed, thinking it might be useful as "blanks," samples with nondetectable pollution levels.

A few months later, the first batch of samples from Nunavik — glass vials holding a half-cup of milk from each of 24 women — arrived by air mail at the lab in Quebec.

Dewailly soon got a phone call from the lab director. Something was wrong with the Arctic milk. The chemical concentrations were off the charts. The peaks overloaded the lab's equipment, running off the page. The technician thought the samples must have been tainted in transit.

Upon checking more breast milk, the scientists soon realized that the peaks were, in fact, accurate: The Arctic mothers had seven times more PCBs in their milk than mothers in Canada's biggest cities.

Dewailly contacted the World Health Organization (news - web sites) in Geneva, where an expert in chemical safety told him that the PCB levels were the highest he had ever seen. Those women, the expert said, should stop breast-feeding their babies.

Dewailly hung up the phone, his mind reeling. He knew that mother's milk is the most nutritious food of all, and that Nunavik, located on Hudson Bay, is so remote that mothers had nothing else to feed their infants. As a doctor, he couldn't in good conscience tell them to quit breast-feeding. But he knew he couldn't hide the problem, either.

"Breast milk is supposed to be a gift," said Dewailly, who today is among the world's leading experts on the human health effects of contaminants. "It isn't supposed to be a poison."

Nearly a generation has passed since those first vials of breast milk arrived in the Quebec laboratory. The babies Dewailly agonized over are now 16 years old, about to pass to their own children the chemical load amassing in their bodies.

Top of the World

From ice-clinging algae to polar bears, the Arctic has a long and intricate ladder of life. An estimated 650,000 indigenous people inhabit the top rung, and their population is steadily growing. About 90,000 are the Inuit of Eastern Canada and Greenland — a territory of Denmark under its own home-rule government. Others, spread across eight nations and speaking dozens of languages, include the 350,000 Yakuts of Siberian Russia, Alaska's Inupiat and Yup'ik, and Scandinavia's Saami.

Environmental scientists suspect that industrial chemicals first hitched a ride to the Arctic in the 1940s.

The chemicals, such as polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, originate in the cities of North America, Europe and Asia. They travel thousands of miles north via winds, ocean currents and rivers. In the Arctic, the sea is a deep-freeze archive, storing contaminants that are slow to break down in cold temperatures and low sunlight. Ingested first by zooplankton, the chemicals spread through the food web as one species consumes another.

Scientists say the Arctic's water and air are much cleaner than they are in urban environments. PCBs and DDT in the fish and mammals of such areas as the Great Lakes, the Baltic and the North Sea are 10 to 100 times higher in concentration than in the Arctic Ocean.

But most urban dwellers consume food from a host of sources, eating comparatively limited amounts of seafood and no marine mammals or other top predators high on the food web. Instead, they consume mostly land-raised foods with low contaminant levels.

lnuit, by contrast, eat much like a polar bear does, consuming the blubber and meat of fish-eating whales, seals, walruses and seabirds four or five links up the marine food chain. Contaminants, which accumulate in animals' fat, magnify in concentration with each step up, from plankton to people.

In newborns' umbilical cord blood and mothers' breast milk, average PCB and mercury levels are 20 to 50 times higher in remote villages of Greenland than in urban areas of the United States and Europe, according to a 2003 report by the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, or AMAP, a scientific consortium created by the eight Arctic nations, including the United States.

In far northern villages such as Qaanaaq, where the Kristiansens live, one of every six adults tested exceeds 200 parts per billion of mercury in the blood, a dose known to cause acute symptoms of mercury poisoning, according to a 2003 United Nations (news - web sites) report.

"That's a huge amount of mercury," said John Risher, a mercury specialist at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (news - web sites)'s toxic substances agency. "At that level, I would really expect to see effects, such as paresthesia, an abnormal sensation, tingling or numbness, especially in the hands."

Few details are known about Russia's Siberia, but AMAP scientists are expected to soon release data showing that residents of the region are more contaminated than Greenlanders. In contrast, Alaska's Inupiat carry low concentrations because they eat bowhead whales that are low on the food web.

PCBs and DDT, the so-called legacy chemicals banned three decades ago in most developed nations, peaked in the Arctic in the 1990s and since then have declined, although they remain at substantially higher levels in people there than elsewhere.

Other compounds are increasing, including mercury and brominated flame retardants called PBDEs. Much of the mercury comes from coal-burning power plants, largely in Asia, while the United States is the major source of the flame retardants, used in plastics and polyurethane foam.

Evidence has emerged recently that the contaminants are threatening the health of Inuit infants and young children.

"Subtle health effects are occurring in certain areas of the Arctic due to exposure to contaminants in traditional food, particularly for mercury and PCBs," according to a 2002 AMAP report.

Building up over a lifetime, chemicals stored in a mother's body cross into the womb, contaminating a fetus before birth. Then the newborn gets an added dose from breast milk.

A study in Arctic Canada, soon to be published, has shown for the first time that the risks of traditional foods seem to outweigh their benefits, said Gina Muckle of Laval University's Department of Social and Preventive Medicine in Quebec, who directed the study.

In Muckle's study, 11-month-old Nunavik babies were repeatedly shown a picture while researchers recorded how readily the children recognized images they already had seen. The infants with high amounts of PCBs in their bodies were 10% less likely to recognize the images than infants with low PCB levels.

A separate, smaller study also linked PCBs with slight neurological effects in older children in Qaanaaq. The studies confirm similar neurological effects detected in children elsewhere, including the Great Lakes region.

Also in Nunavik, infants exposed in the womb to high levels of DDT and PCBs suffered more ear and respiratory infections, particularly in the first six months of life, according to a study by Laval University's Frederic Dallaire, also about to be published.

Dewailly said the increased infection rate is the most serious of the known threats because Arctic children suffer extremely elevated rates of ear infections, which often lead to hearing loss, and respiratory infections.

"Nunavik has a cluster of sick babies," he said. "They fill the waiting rooms of the clinics."

No Cows, Pigs, Chickens

A year-round icy shield — thicker than a mile in some places — covers 85% of Greenland. The island has no trees, no grass, no fertile soil, which means no cows, no pigs, no chickens, no grains, no vegetables, no fruit orchards.

Instead, the ocean is Greenland's food basket.

Sandwiched between Canada and Scandinavia, Greenland gets the brunt of the world's contaminants because it is in the path of winds from both European and North American cities.

In the remote parts of Greenland, such as the Kristiansens' village of Qaanaaq, people eat marine mammals and seabirds 36 times a month on average, consuming about a pound of seal and whale each week. About one-third of their calories come from traditional foods.

"We eat seal meat as you eat cow in your country," said Jonathan Motzfeldt, who was Greenland's premier for almost 30 years and is now its finance minister. "It's important for Greenlanders to have meat on the table."

The Inuit say their native food strengthens their bodies, warming them from within like a fire glowing inside a lantern. When they eat anything else, instead of fire inside, they feel ice.

"We are living in a place that is very cold, and it's not by accident we eat what we do. We are not able to survive on other food," Lars Rasmussen, a 52-year-old hunter from Nuuk, the capital of Greenland, said through a translator. "Hunting is so important to us, so fundamental, that we will not be able to survive without it."

Everything else, from tea to bread, must be imported. In remote villages, stores stock processed and canned food that is expensive, frequently stale and not very tasty or nutritious. In Nunavut, across Baffin Bay from Greenland, store-bought food for a family of four would cost $240 per week, more than one-third of the average family income there, according to a report by Canada's Northern Contaminants Program.

Jose Kusugak, president of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, the organization representing Canadian Inuit, said he can buy "lame lettuce" and "really old oranges" and "dried up apples" in Nunavut, or he can eat fresh and nutritious beluga, walrus, fish and caribou. "There is really no alternative," he said.

In some respects, the marine diet has made the Inuit among the world's healthiest people. Beluga whale meat has 10 times the iron of beef, twice the protein and five times the Vitamin A.

Omega 3 fatty acids in the seafood protect the Inuit from heart disease and diabetes. Seventy-year-old Inuit men have coronary arteries as elastic as those of 20-year-old Danes, said Dr. Gert Mulvad of the Primary Health Care Clinic in Nuuk.

Although heart disease has increased with the introduction of processed foods, especially among Greenlandic young people, it remains "more or less unknown," Mulvad said.

Public health officials are torn over whether to encourage the Inuit to continue eating their traditional diet or reduce their consumption.

"The first goal of medicine is to do no harm, so I'm not absolutely convinced we should restrict beluga fat. It has a huge, huge beneficial effect on cardiovascular disease," said Dewailly, who heads public health research at Laval University Medical Research Center.

Government officials and doctors fear that Inuit will switch to imported processed foods loaded with carbohydrates and sugar, risking malnourishment, vitamin deficiencies, heart disease, diabetes and obesity.

"The level of contamination is very high in Greenland, but there's a lot of Western food that is worse than the poisons," Mulvad said.

Greenland's home-rule government and doctors have issued no advisories. Many Greenlanders are aware of the contamination, although they know few details. In Canada, however, there has been extensive outreach to indigenous people, including trips by Dewailly and other scientists to explain their findings in detail. But public health officials there still struggle, after 16 years, with what dietary advice to give.

Last year, Nunavik leaders initiated an experiment in three communities that gives women free Arctic char, a fish high in fatty acids but low in PCBs, to encourage them to eat less beluga blubber, the main source of contaminants there.

Most Inuit have not altered their diet in response to the contamination, according to dietary surveys in Canada. In Arctic cultures, people rely on the traditional knowledge of hunters and elders, and with no visible signs of pollution or people dying, many are skeptical that the chemicals exist. Some even suspect talk about chemicals is a ploy to strip them of their traditions.

Moreover, health officials point out that the risks of contaminants are greatly outweighed by other societal problems, including smoking, suicide, domestic violence and binge drinking, which have a severe and immediate impact on life and death in the Arctic. For example, more than half of pregnant women in Greenland smoke cigarettes.

Those who are aware of the dangers of the toxic chemicals say their meats are too nutritious and important to give up.

"People say whale and seal are polluted, but they are still healthy foods to us," said Ujuunnguaq Heinrich, a minke whale and seal hunter in Nuuk.

Anthropologists warn that efforts to alter Inuit diets can unwittingly cause irreversible cultural changes. If hunting is discouraged, people quickly would lose their traditional knowledge about the environment and their hunting skills, as well as material items such as tools and clothing, said Robert Wheelersburg, an anthropologist at Elizabethtown College in Pennsylvania who specializes in Arctic cultures.

Their art, their spirituality, their celebrations, their storytelling, even their language would suffer. Inuit dialects are steeped in the nuances of nature that their national languages — English, Danish and French — ignore.

Wheelersburg said the most important damage would be to Inuit "values and attitudes." In the Arctic's subsistence economy, people share prey among neighbors and relatives, even strangers. The best hunters are leaders in the village, and they are generous with their wealth. If the Inuit switch to a cash society, that communal generosity would disappear, Wheelersburg said.

"It's more than the food you are changing," Wheelersburg said. "It's the actual catching and hunting of it that really generates the cultural characteristics." Even skipping one generation would impair hunting skills, he said, and "once they are lost, I don't see how you can regenerate them."

Survival of the Fittest

Like everyone else in Qaanaaq, the Kristiansens remain mostly oblivious to the scientists and political leaders fretting about how many parts per billion of toxic chemicals are in their bodies.

They simply don't have the luxury to worry about dangers so imperceptible, so intangible. Instead, hunters worry about things they can hear and see: thinning ice conditions, the whereabouts of whales, where their next meat will come from. Anxiety about chemicals is left to those who live in distant lands, those who generated the compounds, those whose bodies contain far less.

About 850 miles from the North Pole, Qaanaaq, an isolated village of about 600, is the closest on Earth to the archetype of traditional polar life. Inuit there hunt seal, beluga, walrus and narwhal in the icy waters of a fjord.

Every spring, when the midnight sun returns, the Arctic's treasures, long locked in the ice, are within reach again. On a freezing-cold June afternoon, narwhal season has begun. Gedion and Mamarut head out on their sledges, their dogs racing 35 miles across the glacier, toward the Kristiansens' ancestral hunting grounds, a narrow strip of sapphire blue in the distance.

The Kristiansen brothers learned to hunt narwhal from their father, who, in turn, learned from his own relatives. It won't be long before Gedion's son, Rasmus, now 6, will be paddling a kayak beside his father.

Gedion jokes that he lassos narwhals from his kayak like the American cowboys he has seen on television. A little over a century ago, the people of Qaanaaq had little contact with the Western world. Today, they can buy salami and dental floss and Danish porn magazines in their small local market, and watch "A Nightmare on Elm Street" in their living rooms on the one TV station that beams into Qaanaaq.

The Kristiansens also know that other elements travel to their homeland, riding upon winter winds.

They learned a little about the contaminants — the akuutissat minguttitsisut — from listening to the radio. But they have not changed their diet, and no one has advised them to. Virtually every day, they eat seal meat and muktuk. With every bite, traces of mercury, PCBs and other chemicals amass in their bodies, to be passed on to their children.

"We can't avoid them," Gedion said in Greenlandic. "It's our food."

Since 2000 BC, the Inuit legacy has been passed on to generations of boys by generations of men. Their ancestors' memories, as vivid as a dream, mingle with their own, inseparable.

"Qaatuppunga piniartarlunga," Mamarut said.

As far back as I can remember, I hunted.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Tue, Jan-13-04, 20:40
wwdimmitt's Avatar
wwdimmitt wwdimmitt is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 579
 
Plan: Atkins/Protein Power
Stats: 271/217/186 Male 6'1"
BF:
Progress: 64%
Location: Limon, Colorado
Default

Very sobering article. Thank you for bringing it to our attention.

The industrial rape of indigenous peoples continues, even when they attempt to avoid us and to maintain their traditional lifestyles. Possibly an interesting future footnote to evolutionary trends, neh?
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Wed, Jan-14-04, 12:13
gotbeer's Avatar
gotbeer gotbeer is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 2,889
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 280/203/200 Male 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 96%
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Default

Although industrialization has perhaps exacerbated the problem, it is also true that the foods they eat are further up the food chain, which concentrates the toxic compounds. Some of the toxins occur naturally (as well), like mercury. I'd expect to see relatively elevated levels even if we compared tissue samples from 2000 years ago.

Our (ideal) food chain:

Soil->Grass->Cow->Beefsteak

Their actual food chain:

microbe -> microbe -> ...etc...crustacean -> crustacean ->...etc... -> fish -> fish -> fish ->...etc... -> sealsteak/whalesteak.

Last edited by Kristine : Sat, Sep-11-04 at 15:24. Reason: fixing horizontal scrolling
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Wed, Jan-14-04, 12:41
Zuleikaa Zuleikaa is offline
Finding the Pieces
Posts: 17,049
 
Plan: Mishmash
Stats: 365/308.0/185 Female 66
BF:
Progress: 32%
Location: Maryland, US
Default

What do you mean as "our" ideal. Yours in particular or human kinds?
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Wed, Jan-14-04, 12:46
gotbeer's Avatar
gotbeer gotbeer is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 2,889
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 280/203/200 Male 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 96%
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Default

By "our" I meant forum members (low-carb dieters). I meant "ideal" in the sense that we prefer organically-raised food.

Last edited by gotbeer : Wed, Jan-14-04 at 12:53.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Wed, Jan-14-04, 12:53
gotbeer's Avatar
gotbeer gotbeer is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 2,889
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 280/203/200 Male 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 96%
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Default

And...speaking of less-than-ideal food chains...

"The Beast in the Garden" by David Baron

It's no illusion -- mountain lions are attacking more humans than they used to. And why not? After all, we lured the big cats into our suburbs and taught them to view us as food.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
Reviewed By Katharine Mieszkowski


link to review

Jan. 14, 2004 | Last Thursday, Jan. 8, at around noon, a mountain lion killed and ate a 35-year-old biker at the Whiting Ranch Wilderness Park in Orange County, Calif., just half a mile from the nearest suburban home.

The competitive cyclist's mauled corpse was found partially buried under sand, cached for later feeding. Another mountain biker riding in the same wilderness area that afternoon barely escaped the 110-pound cougar, when other cyclists fought off the cat as it clutched her head in its jaws. (The terms "mountain lion," "cougar," "puma," "catamount" and "panther" all refer to the same New World feline carnivore, known to biologists as Felis concolor.)

Responding to the gruesome news, wildlife officials stressed that it's extremely rare for a mountain lion to attack full-grown, healthy adult humans in broad daylight for food. Since 1890, there have only been 14 attacks by mountain lions on humans verified in California, according to the state's Department of Fish and Game.

But it's getting less rare. Nine of those 14 mountain lion attacks have taken place since 1992.

Why are more mountain lions coming to see us as just another flavor of meat? With suburban sprawl edging closer to what's left of the ever-shrinking wilderness, it's tempting to cast such attacks as an inevitable, if grisly, consequence. We seek to escape each other by living and playing closer to nature, and nature bites back.

But David Baron's book "The Beast in the Garden" suggests a more disturbing explanation, beyond humans' ever-deeper expansion into prime puma country. In his first book, Baron, a longtime science reporter for National Public Radio, argues that there's nothing natural about the predation of Homo sapiens by cougars. Rather, humans are unwittingly teaching mountain lions to be more of a threat to us.

"The Beast in the Garden" is told like a whodunit, in reverse. From the beginning, we know the identity of the killer: a 100-pound adult male mountain lion spotted near the eviscerated corpse of an 18-year-old jogger in the Rocky Mountain foothills west of Denver in 1991. Baron sets out to uncover how and why an animal known to biologists to be nocturnal and elusive, likely to flee if and when it is seen, came to pounce upon a high school student out for a run during fifth period, just after a lunch of pepperoni pizza at the local 7-Eleven.

In the early 1960s, just 30 years before this attack, the feline predator had been almost entirely eliminated from its historic range throughout the United States, with only 4,000 cougars thought to survive, and as few as 124 estimated to be hanging on in Colorado. Settlers, hunters and ranchers had slaughtered the cats to protect their livestock and game, and the feds aided and abetted the bloodbath, creating a cadre of government-paid killers in the name of predator control.

One early 20th century mountain man, famous for his cougar-tracking skills, was said to eat lion meat to gain the cat's agility and endurance -- all the better to stalk the stalker. Even national parks saw the mountain lions as vermin to be exterminated to make the landscape safer for more "desirable" species.

But as soon as the mountain lion was all but gone, people wanted it back. When the environmental movement took off in the '60s and '70s, "the public came to see humans as humanity's biggest threat and nature as the Earth's savior," Baron writes. And as cougar bounties fell out of fashion and the cat's population rebounded, the mountain lions returned to a tamer, more feline-friendly landscape.

The predator-eradication program that had slaughtered so many lions had been even more successful in wiping out wolves -- the mountain lion's biggest natural enemy. Without wolves around to hunt them, a new generation of big cats was born with less to fear.

Abandoned mines even provided excellent artificial shelter for the big cats, like so many cougar hotels: "The early miners, who killed countless cougars and destroyed wildlife habitat while raping the foothills for gold, had left a legacy that helped the lions upon their homecoming a century later," Baron writes.

And the eradication of wolves and most of the grizzlies had set off a corresponding boom in herbivore populations, like deer -- one of the mountain lion's favorite foods. Near where the mountain lion would latter eat the jogging teenager, the fleece and Teva-wearing residents of Boulder, Colo., reveled in living in a city surrounded by acres of open space. They were delighted to find so many Bambis munching on their front lawns, not realizing that as this prey species grew bolder around humans -- feeding all day long, rather than just at dawn and dusk, mountain lions would be drawn in after them. (Boulder was so fond of its deer that when wildlife biologists tried to conduct a study on them, activists staged nocturnal raids to liberate the animals from traps.)

Boulder's nature-loving denizens may represent an extreme, but today's Westerners, in general, are more likely to watch wildlife with binoculars than through a rifle scope. As Baron traces a series of encounters between humans and mountain lions in the area that led up to the 1991 killing of the jogger, the unexpected consequences of that tolerance come into focus. A dog is snatched out of a backyard pen and eaten; a mountain lion wanders downtown near boozing college students on a Thursday night; another jogger is treed by two cats, only to be spared when a deer happens by, distracting the predators with a more familiar menu item.

In trying to "re-create a mythic past -- a time when man and beast lived in harmony," Baron writes, the residents of Boulder had removed the negative reinforcement that had made generations of mountain lions fear humans. A unilateral cease-fire in the war with mountain lions succeeded only in casting humans as the cats' new prey.

Not that Baron is advocating picking up a shotgun and shooting every animal with a demonstrated taste for human flesh. But as he tells the story of the frustrated wildlife biologists who tried to sound the alarm as the lions around Boulder grew bolder, in the period before the jogger's death, he suggests that some more humane aversion-training may be in order.

Call it modern-day predator control. Tagging or radio-collaring mountain lions that are seen by people would help biologists understand which individual cats have learned not to fear humans, and should be re-educated or shipped to a remoter locale. Montana officials, for instance, have had success using packs of trained dogs and beanbag-loaded guns to school grizzlies that spend too much time around humans.

Whether we vilify mountain lions as vermin or revere them as one of the last great predators still roaming the United States, we have to live with the ways that we've reshaped the environment they've returned to -- and the ways that have changed the cougars themselves.

As usual, it turns out to be too late to go back to nature, even in a place that's seemingly as close to it as Boulder. "If nature has grown artificial, then restoring wilderness requires human intervention," Baron puts it. "We must manage nature in order to leave it alone."
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Wed, Jan-14-04, 13:48
bvtaylor's Avatar
bvtaylor bvtaylor is offline
There and Back Again
Posts: 1,590
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 200/194.4/140 Female 5'3"
BF:42%/42%/20%
Progress: 9%
Location: Northern Colorado
Default The level of toxins in fish today is not natural.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gotbeer
Some of the toxins occur naturally (as well), like mercury. I'd expect to see relatively elevated levels even if we compared tissue samples from 2000 years ago.

To add some information--athough there is some natural mercury and there may indeed have been some elevation of levels as you reference, particularly in the food-chain hierarchy, I think that the extremely high mercury levels in our time which are seriously contaminating the world's supply of fish, and are referenced along with PCB's and other toxins, are more the direct result of industrial byproducts.

Here's a clip from a CNN article on mercury:

http://www.cnn.com/2001/HEALTH/pare.../fish.pregnant/

(from 2001)
According to the EPA, states are primarily responsible for protecting their residents from contaminated noncommercially caught fish. Almost 68 percent of state-issued consumption advisories are a result of mercury contamination in fish and shellfish. Last December, the Clinton administration announced that mercury emissions from power plants pose a significant health hazard and proposed regulations to reduce them by 2004. An EPA official now says that decision is "under review" and that "no decisions have been made yet."

Mercury occurs naturally in the environment, but in the United States more mercury enters the air through industrial emissions, the biggest source being coal-fired power plants. Once there, the mercury enters waterways and accumulates in the muscle tissue of fish.

Fish and other seafood products are the main source of methylmercury toxicity in humans, and fetuses are particularly vulnerable.

Here's another article of interest:

http://www.oehha.org/fish/general/memerc.html

Where does methylmercury in fish come from?
Methylmercury in fish comes from mercury in the aquatic environment. Mercury, a metal, is widely found in nature in rock and soil, and is washed into surface waters during storms. Mercury evaporates from rock, soil, and water into the air, and then falls back to the earth in rain, often far from where it started. Human activities redistribute mercury and can increase its concentration in the aquatic environment. The coastal mountains in northern California are naturally rich in mercury in the form of cinnabar ore, which was processed to produce quicksilver, a liquid form of inorganic mercury. This mercury was taken to the Sierra Nevada, Klamath mountains, and other regions, where it was used in gold mining. Historic mining operations and the remaining tailings from abandoned mercury and gold mines have contributed to the release of large amounts of mercury into California's surface waters. Mercury can also be released into the environment from industrial sources, including the burning of fossil fuels and solid wastes, and disposal of mercury-containing products.

Once mercury gets into water, much of it settles to the bottom where bacteria in the mud or sand convert it to the organic form of methylmercury. Fish absorb methylmercury when they eat smaller aquatic organisms. Larger and older fish absorb more methylmercury as they eat other fish. In this way, the amount of methylmercury builds up as it passes through the food chain. Fish eliminate methylmercury slowly, and so it builds up in fish in much greater concentrations than in the surrounding water. Methylmercury generally reaches the highest levels in predatory fish at the top of the aquatic food chain.

This is another interesting article:

http://www.usgs.gov/themes/factshee.../#contamination

Mercury Contamination - Past, Present, and Future

In highly polluted areas where mercury has accumulated through industrial or mining activities, natural processes may bury, dilute, or erode the mercury deposits, resulting in declines in concentration. In many relatively pristine areas, however, mercury concentrations have actually increased because atmospheric deposition has increased. For instance, concentrations of mercury in feathers of fish-eating seabirds from the northeastern Atlantic Ocean have steadily increased for more than a century. In North American sediment cores, sediments deposited since industrialization have mercury concentrations about 3-5 times those found in older sediments. Some sites may have become methylmercury hot spots inadvertently through human activities. Lake acidification, addition of substances like sulfur that stimulate methylation, and mobilization of mercury in soils in newly flooded reservoirs or constructed wetlands have been shown to increase the likelihood that mercury will become a problem in fish. Although scientists from USGS and elsewhere are beginning to unravel the complex interactions between mercury and the environment, a lack of information on the sources, behavior, and effects of mercury in the environment has impeded identification of effective management responses to the Nation's growing mercury problem.

Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Sat, Sep-11-04, 18:02
woodpecker woodpecker is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 265
 
Plan: atkins
Stats: 185/180/165 Male 68 inches
BF:25
Progress: 25%
Location: Nova Scotia
Default

I think it is only a matter of time before the Japanese or some other big fish- eating nation puts mercury poisoning on the international agenda. You don't have to be an environmentalist to see that this situation is getting out-of-hand.

Last edited by woodpecker : Sun, Sep-12-04 at 06:30. Reason: clarification
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Sun, Sep-12-04, 19:12
fatburner's Avatar
fatburner fatburner is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 151
 
Plan: low low carb
Stats: 142/146/148 Male 177
BF:?/?/22%
Progress: 67%
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woodpecker
I think it is only a matter of time before the Japanese or some other big fish- eating nation puts mercury poisoning on the international agenda. You don't have to be an environmentalist to see that this situation is getting out-of-hand.


Tragic indeed. Even if environmental pollution stopped right now, hundreds of generations into the future (of all species, not just humans) will still be adversly affected. The Inuit are just the unlucky first cab off the rank.
To my knowledge, there are two ways of reducing environmental mercury in the body . One is a high selenium intake (and presumably vit. E as well, since they are so synergistic) and the other donating blood and plasma regularly. Well three actually, if you include EDTA chelation, but that's very expensive.
But does anybody know just how effective the first two approaches are? And are PCB's and other pollutants similarly reduced? I'm happy to give blood and plasma anyway. Many others will benefit. Particularly because my LowCarb blood is so darned healthy . But is it also much lower in the 'silent springs' as well , because I share the accumulated environmental toxins in my blood with the medically needy?

Last edited by fatburner : Sun, Sep-12-04 at 22:00.
Reply With Quote
  #10   ^
Old Mon, Sep-13-04, 07:42
mio1996's Avatar
mio1996 mio1996 is offline
Glutton for Grease!
Posts: 1,338
 
Plan: Primal-VLC
Stats: 295/190/190 Male 76
BF:don't/really/care
Progress: 100%
Location: Clemson, SC
Default

I hope donating blood is pretty effective. I donate every 8 weeks and eat a lot of salmon and tuna. I think you're right--that low carb blood is a precious commodity that should be shared with the world
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
U.S. Urges Limits On Eating Albacore: Concerns About Mercury Levels nobimbo LC Research/Media 8 Tue, Mar-23-04 06:35
Study shows potential toxic effects of long-term Creatine usage Voyajer Nutrition & Supplements 2 Thu, Jan-08-04 17:54
Inuit stick to blubber despite Arctic pollution doreen T LC Research/Media 0 Fri, Oct-11-02 15:56


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 14:52.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.