Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Local Low-Carbers & Support Groups > Australia / New Zealand
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Mark Forums Read Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Sat, Jun-26-04, 21:32
Alex123's Avatar
Alex123 Alex123 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 139
 
Plan: own modified
Stats: 238/212/176 Female 180
BF:
Progress: 42%
Location: Queensland Australia
Question Carb Count on Australian food labels

I'm fairly new to serious low carbing and am curious about the count on labels. On Australian labels does the carbohydrate count include the fibre or not.

For example if a label states
30 g carbohdryate
6 g fibre

do I deduct the 6 from 30 giving a count of 24?

Also I have been looking at sugar free sweets and notice that under carbohydrate it says 0, however it then goes on to list a number of grams under something ending in ose (can't remember the exact word). I thought that words ending in 'ose' were sugar so should they be counted.

Thank you.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Sat, Jun-26-04, 22:00
mcsblues mcsblues is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 690
 
Plan: Protein Power
Stats: 250/190/185 Male 6' 1"
BF:30+/16/15
Progress: 92%
Location: Australia
Default

Hi Alex,

Don't subtract fibre on Australian or European foods as it is calculated separately.

You are right that most "ose" ending words are sugars and therefore have carbs. The only exception I can think of off hand is "sucralose" which is the technical name for Splenda. Since it is made from cane sugar (sucrose) it still has the "ose" ending, but it has been chemically altered (chlorinated) so the body does not recognise it as a sugar (or any sort of carbohydrate), so the label may be correct.

Check out this thread (and join the Aussie forum);

http://www.empowerfoods.com.au/foru...topic.php?t=412

Cheers,

Malcolm

Last edited by mcsblues : Sat, Jun-26-04 at 22:08.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Sun, Jun-27-04, 23:22
tribal's Avatar
tribal tribal is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 62
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 238/207/175 Male 5ft9''
BF:??/21/18
Progress: 49%
Location: Melbourne, Aus
Default

So you're saying the fiber is already subtracted from the carb total?

uh-oh
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Mon, Jun-28-04, 02:50
showtime showtime is offline
New Member
Posts: 23
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 199/190/173 Male 5ft 10inch
BF:
Progress: 35%
Location: New Zealand
Default Dont Agre

Sorry but i dont agee about fiber, i have read and been told in other forums that you do subtract the fiber amount off the carb amount, so that would be 30grams carbs - 6 grams fiber = 24 grams digestable carbs!
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Mon, Jun-28-04, 03:13
mcsblues mcsblues is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 690
 
Plan: Protein Power
Stats: 250/190/185 Male 6' 1"
BF:30+/16/15
Progress: 92%
Location: Australia
Default

Never mind - it is a mistake we all make because the books are almost always from the US, and the authors neglect to tell you that in Europe and Australia these things are calculated separately - In America they use the "difference method" where fat, protein and water content are established and the difference (remainder) is deemed to be carbohydrate. This is why the Eades came up with the idea of the effective carbohydrate count (ECC) to give a true reflection of a food's impact on the body - subtracting the fibre content as it is not digested, and therefore has no impact on blood sugar (or insulin). Dr Atkins adopted the idea as "net carbs" (Atkins Nutritionals now also discount sugar alcohols - something which I think is somewhat questionable as these can give varying degrees of insulin response.)

But in Australia and Europe - the work has been done for you on the label.

Cheers,

Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Tue, Jun-29-04, 02:00
showtime showtime is offline
New Member
Posts: 23
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 199/190/173 Male 5ft 10inch
BF:
Progress: 35%
Location: New Zealand
Default

Sorry but still find it hard to get to grips with, why then do the have the fiber label seperate to carbs? unlike the fats that are seperated into classes but still under the one heading FATS, if you are correct can you amagine how many LCers are deducting fiber off there total carbs and getting an incorrect reading!!!

and what about fitday??
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Tue, Jun-29-04, 03:39
mcsblues mcsblues is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 690
 
Plan: Protein Power
Stats: 250/190/185 Male 6' 1"
BF:30+/16/15
Progress: 92%
Location: Australia
Default

As to why americans do things differently, I really don't know, but from a dietary point of view it makes sense to list fibre separately as we do 'here' (and the Eades and Atkins agree!) The only subset of carbohydrate on 'our' labels are sugars - which also makes sense as all sugars are carbs, but not all carbs are sugars ... yet (until you digest them).

As far as Fitday is concerned, that is an american site so the american rules apply (you subtract fibre). The same is true of a site like the USDA food comp site;

http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/

but if you use one of 'ours' eg. Foodstandards;

http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/npc/npc_calc.cfm

then the Australasian/European rule applies.

Cheers,

Malcolm
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Update food labels, experts urge U.S. government doreen T LC Research/Media 3 Fri, Dec-12-03 16:40
New food labels may not solve trans problem Ghost LC Research/Media 5 Mon, Nov-03-03 19:26
"Food labels to reveal artery-clogging trans fat" gotbeer LC Research/Media 5 Thu, Jul-10-03 11:16
Cooked Tomatoes' Carb Count PineSlayer General Low-Carb 1 Mon, Jul-29-02 22:37
Food labels to carry disease-fighting claims tamarian LC Research/Media 2 Fri, Jun-15-01 09:36


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:17.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.