Tue, Nov-13-18, 09:33
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 15,075
|
|
Plan: mostly milkfat
Stats: 190/152.4/154
BF:
Progress: 104%
Location: Ontario
|
|
I like the way I see metabolic rate "measured" on bodybuilding formulas. It doesn't matter what calculator you use. Or you could start with an arbitrary number.
How I approach things, I think I stole it from them;
Say I start at 2000 calories. I tend to eat the same thing every day, I think that might help. So, I'll eat 2000 calories for a couple of weeks, same food. If I stay at the same weight, I'll figure that's my maintenance. If I lose, I'm below maintenance, if I gain, I'm above. From there I can adjust up or down, try to maintain.
Of course this sounds like CICO, but isn't quite. CICO as often expressed assumes that carbohydrate and fat (and maybe protein, at least once protein requirement has been met) are interchangeable. But by eating the same thing every day, I've clamped for differences in hormonal response there would have been from variations in macros from day to day, and also variations in water retention there might have been due to differences in salt intake and possibly differences in response to different foods (intolerances)?
Of course by being male, I've clamped for other variations in hormones etc. In one mouse model, simply restricting female mice to 95 percent of what they would have eaten if they'd been given the choice caused weight gain--and I've always wanted to see that experiment repeated with "restriction" to 100 percent of calories. I sort of suspect that having exactly enough food versus extra they don't bother eating is probably stressful. Even in the wild, there is more food out there than any individual animal actually needs, much of the year, there being just exactly enough food available being perceived as scarcity and signalling coming deprivation sort of makes sense.
|