Tue, May-26-09, 13:41
|
Senior Member
Posts: 1,110
|
|
Plan: Carnivore
Stats: 235/175/150
BF:
Progress: 71%
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NixCarbos
This is completely destroying the point of this thread, but to answer capmikee's question:
Info taken from here:
"Aborted babies used as source for rubella vaccine," Press Release,
Ohio Parents for Vaccine Safety (251 West Ridgeway Drive, Dayton, OH
45459; tel: 513-435-4750), 9 December 1994.
M. Jarmulowicz, "Use of fetal cell lines in vaccine production,"
<CMO>, November 1994, 26-28.
The vaccine industry and government regulatory agencies (e.g. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, World Health Organization, British Ministry of
Health, etc.) are trying to adopt alternative strategies to avoid returning to
aborted fetuses for vaccine components. Encouraging alternative
vaccine research for vaccine development will provide a strong
incentive to dissuade the future justification of further abortions
and fetal research for vaccine components.
|
I did a quick google search and interestingly, there WERE fetal cells used in some vaccines, and, interestingly, the cells are grown in a lab and were all from three fetuses (that's not a typo). NOW, fetal tissue isn't used. Real information on this, however, is not that easy to find with a google search as most sites instead of reporting facts choose to show gruesome pictures of aborted fetuses. As is their right
HOWEVER, it's still homeopathic.
My original point was nitpicking over definitions. And I learned something very interesting. Thank you
Edit to add: Apparently, chicken pox vaccine still has fetal tissue in it -- still cultured from cell line of the one embryo.
|