Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Wed, Jul-09-03, 16:39
gotbeer's Avatar
gotbeer gotbeer is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 2,889
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 280/203/200 Male 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 96%
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Default "Food labels to reveal artery-clogging trans fat"

Food labels to reveal artery-clogging trans fat

Wednesday, July 9, 2003 Posted: 2:48 PM EDT (1848 GMT)


link to article

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Trans fat hasn't gotten the attention its infamous cousin, saturated fat, earned through warnings and labels. That's about to change: After 10 years of debate, the government is requiring food labels to reveal exact levels of the artery clogger.

"We have so many Americans -- 500,000 -- that are suffering each year from heart disease and heart defects and a lot of that (is) attributable to trans fatty acids," said Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson, appearing on CNN.

Trans fat is the stuff that helps make such foods as doughnuts, french fries, crackers and fried chicken taste so good. But it's at least as dangerous to the heart as saturated fat -- and many doctors consider it worse. And until now, consumers have had no way of knowing how much trans fat they eat.

"We think if the consumers know what is best for them, they will purchase the proper foods in the proper amounts and do a much better job of improving their health," Thompson said.

Food and Drug Administration regulations unveiled Wednesday will require nutrition labels to include a new line listing the amount of trans fat in each food right under the amount of saturated fat.

Add the two lines together to learn the total of heart-risky fats in every serving.

"Our choices about our diets are choices about our health, and those choices should be based on the best available scientific information," said FDA Commissioner Mark McClellan. "This label change means trans fat can no longer lurk, hidden, in our food choices."

"It's a good first step," said Margo Wootan of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, which petitioned FDA in 1993 to make the change. "People will be able to compare different products and determine which ones are worse for their hearts."

But Wootan cautioned that the comparisons won't be easy: The labels won't tell consumers how much each cookie or dollop of margarine counts against their daily allotment of total unhealthy fat. Nor will they bear a message FDA debated this spring -- that trans fat consumption should be as low as possible.

The FDA promised more research to find ways to educate consumers about heart-damaging fats so that they make better food choices.

Consumer choices

The FDA has estimated that merely revealing trans fat content on labels would save between 2,000 and 5,600 lives a year, as people either would choose healthier foods or manufacturers would change their recipes to leave out the damaging ingredient.

The government is giving companies until 2006 to phase in the change.

But some companies already have begun jockeying for position in the anti-trans fat market: Frito-Lay has announced it is eliminating trans fat from its popular Doritos, Tostitos and Cheetos, and became the first major manufacturer to voluntarily begin adding trans fat content to the labels of other brands earlier this year. Wednesday, Unilever Bestfoods announced its line of "I Can't Believe It's Not Butter" margarine spreads will be free of trans fat by next year.

"Clearly this is going to be a major change to food labels, and it's going to help consumers who are seeking information about trans fat content of foods to find it," said Tim Willard of the National Food Processors Association.

Saturated fat is found primarily in meat and other products containing animal fat. People are advised to eat no more than 20 grams a day, about 10 percent of calories.

Some surveys suggest trans fat comprises up to another 10 percent. Both types can increase the risk of heart disease, although some research suggests trans fat may be the worst culprit.

Trans fat is in numerous products, from meats and dairy products to pastries. The most common source is partially hydrogenated vegetable oil, where liquid oil is turned into a solid to protect against spoiling and maintain long-term flavor.

Typically, the harder a margarine or cooking fat, the more trans fat it includes. Soft, spreadable margarine in tubs, for instance, contains little if any trans fat, while stick margarine can contain a lot. In other foods, the only way consumers could tell which contained trans fat was to check the ingredient list for the word "hydrogenated."

The National Academy of Sciences, which sets nutrition levels, last year ruled that while eating some trans fat may be unavoidable, there is no safe level that it could set as an upper limit.

FDA had considered putting a footnote on labels recommending eating only a little trans fat, but consumer testing found that had the unintended consequence of scaring people back to foods high in saturated fat, said Stephanie Childs of the Grocery Manufacturers of America, which lobbied against the move.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Wed, Jul-09-03, 21:04
bacon bacon is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 71
 
Plan: atkins
Stats: 170/160/135
BF:
Progress: 29%
Default

It looks like the food companies are taking these recent lawsuits seriously. They have really decided to do something about it, that is great. I just wish america would do the same. It is no easy task (or cheap) for these large companies to alter production, and it is not the final answer. Everyone in the country needs to alter their eating habits as well. We need to see many more people exersizing and eating in moderation. This will probably benefit many people, but only if they let it. I hope they place some responsibility on themselves as well and exersize and teach themselves to eat moderatly. (this goes for me as well - but i know i am already working on it)
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Thu, Jul-10-03, 05:16
caveman caveman is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 95
 
Plan: my own design
Stats: 258/189/205 Male 6' 3"
BF:?/12%/15%
Progress: 130%
Location: USA
Default FDA makes transfat labeling requirement

The FDA is requiring the amount of trans-fat to be added to the labelling on Nutrient Facts package labels:

http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2003pres/20030709.html

http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/transfat/

Unfortunately, the FDA still says it is better to eat margarine than butter.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Thu, Jul-10-03, 05:39
LovableLC's Avatar
LovableLC LovableLC is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,106
 
Plan: Atkins/low carb mix
Stats: 206/184/130 Female 5'5"
BF:Size 12
Progress: 29%
Default

Another number I have to count?
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Thu, Jul-10-03, 07:26
gotbeer's Avatar
gotbeer gotbeer is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 2,889
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 280/203/200 Male 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 96%
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LovableLC
Another number I have to count?


Not really - just look for a count of ZERO - the NAS says there is NO safe level of trans-fat, and no need for it in one's diet.
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Thu, Jul-10-03, 11:16
MsJinx's Avatar
MsJinx MsJinx is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,249
 
Plan: Schwarzbein II, BA, IS
Stats: 125.4/119.2/115 Female 5'1" small frame
BF:33% /??? / 20%?
Progress: 60%
Location: Texas
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bacon
It is no easy task (or cheap) for these large companies to alter production, and it is not the final answer.



The fact is that most mainstream companies are more concerned about their bottom line than about consumers' health. Don't think that they've found about trans fat recently and decided on their own to change. This is not the case. They have lobbied like mad to NOT have to change. Studies have shown the dangers of trans fat for DECADES. Yes, DECADES.

Moral: Whole foods are ALWAYS better than processed. Hunters and Gatherers UNITE!

Jinx
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Stronger Proof That Trans Fats Are Bad" gotbeer LC Research/Media 0 Tue, Apr-13-04 11:06
New food labels may not solve trans problem Ghost LC Research/Media 5 Mon, Nov-03-03 19:26
Trans fat labeling rule took decades NickFender LC Research/Media 0 Wed, Oct-08-03 10:51
"FOOD 101: Trans Fat Translation" gotbeer LC Research/Media 1 Wed, Oct-08-03 10:49
"No Hiding Most Trans Fats" gotbeer LC Research/Media 0 Fri, Jul-18-03 16:38


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:41.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.