Dr. Davis of Wheatbelly first came on the low carb scene from the vantage of lowering calcium scores through diet and lifestyle, he's probably another good person to send your story to.


Interesting how some areas of the scan changed more than others. If all this is accurate, I'd wonder if there are some differences in local physiology that make reversal more likely.

I wonder how likely an error really is here. Something like ldl cholesterol, each test is a single sampling, calcium scans by nature come as multiple samplings. If the machine was off or something, somehow it was more off in some areas than others--or at least it seems this would be necessary for there to not be some actual decrease in calcium. Seems to me, which I wouldn't put too too much stock in.