Your fasting glucose was flagged as LOW? Rather ironic, no? and in six months! These numbers look fine. A 16 point rise in LDL could just be a function of the formula now having lower Trigs, and 127 is not high anyway. Whatever, many doctors would not advise having tests until weight has been stable for 6 weeks. After losing 85 pounds! In six months! anything could have shown up. Most important are the lower Trigs...very good news there. VLDL mostly transports those Trigs and good news those are lower.
What is your HDL? .That is the so-called "good" cholesterol and the only component of the formula that can be measured in addition to the total.

http://www.zoeharcombe.com/the-know...mpletely-wrong/

CA calcium and NA sodium barely moved, and its concentration can just reflect how hydrated or dehydrated you are. Even when mildly out of range, it is not a big deal for LC. Low liver enzymes are good news, did you read somewhere it could be related to magnesium? IDK, don't see any info about below range being an issue, only above.