Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > Low-Carb War Zone
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61   ^
Old Wed, Jul-01-15, 12:40
bkloots's Avatar
bkloots bkloots is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 10,152
 
Plan: LC--Atkins
Stats: 195/160/150 Female 62in
BF:
Progress: 78%
Location: Kansas City, MO
Default

Things are the same as ever: women/girls can't win. Between the "self acceptance at any size" message and the "you can never be too thin" message, the "be healthy" message gets muddled.

On the upside, so many more girls and young women are involved in all kinds of sports now. The winning U. S. women's soccer team is a case in point. I saw a picture in the newspaper this week of an 11-yr-old girl wearing her football pads. Whether it's athletic cheerleading or gymnastics or swimming or volleyball, etc. girls are no longer discouraged from exercising their competitive muscles.

I'm hoping information sources like That Sugar Movie (can't wait to see it!) will be a further eye-opener for everyone.

It's all about good health, not size.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #62   ^
Old Wed, Jul-01-15, 18:20
pazia pazia is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 374
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 00/00/00 Female 00
BF:
Progress:
Default

I think the shame and feeling apart from others is more of a problem in the impact it has on a young girl's life.

It was inscribed early on that I was a fat girl and should try to hide it or cover it up. Recently saw a pic of myself at age 14 and I was wearing (in summer) a dark navy long-sleeved pantsuit that covered everything, with a scarf covering my "fat" neck -- standing next to a skinnier friend in miniskirt and halter top. But the thing is -- I wasn't fat anymore, maybe a size 11? And yet I had internalized the idea I had to cover up anyway. (I was much prettier than the friend too, though at the time she was always called the "cute one"!)

So I kind of applaud the young girls who don't want to be cheated out of pretty dresses, frilly stuff, etc. even if they look strange to my eyes. I wonder if their peers are critical of their look or if they accept it as normal now?

The other side of it though is, why are so many young girls of such increasingly large size? Probably because they're eating so much of sugar and grains that aren't good for their overall health -- and most importantly to my mind, no good for mental or emotional health and stability. Here we're all too aware of how carbage can affect our balance, I read over and over again here how going LC brings the reward of newfound mental clarity and more balanced emotions. The younger big girls may be experiencing much improved social acceptance, but how their diet may be affecting them in other ways is a big worry.
Reply With Quote
  #63   ^
Old Thu, Jul-02-15, 14:41
KDH's Avatar
KDH KDH is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,247
 
Plan: Atkins/Taubes
Stats: 270/168/160 Female 5'7"
BF:
Progress: 93%
Location: Dallas, TX
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pazia
I think the shame and feeling apart from others is more of a problem in the impact it has on a young girl's life.

It was inscribed early on that I was a fat girl and should try to hide it or cover it up. Recently saw a pic of myself at age 14 and I was wearing (in summer) a dark navy long-sleeved pantsuit that covered everything, with a scarf covering my "fat" neck -- standing next to a skinnier friend in miniskirt and halter top. But the thing is -- I wasn't fat anymore, maybe a size 11? And yet I had internalized the idea I had to cover up anyway. (I was much prettier than the friend too, though at the time she was always called the "cute one"!)

So I kind of applaud the young girls who don't want to be cheated out of pretty dresses, frilly stuff, etc. even if they look strange to my eyes. I wonder if their peers are critical of their look or if they accept it as normal now?



I 110% agree, I don't think anybody should wear horrible, out of season, blah tent/clothes. But everybody should work with what they have, and wear what is most flattering to them. And a pretty size 18 girl in a pretty size 12 dress is crazy to me. I know my mother use to tell me "a size too small will make you look two sizes bigger! And (ouch) she was right. And short-shorts, half-shirts or a tight/revealing dress that might be trendy or seen on the latest celebrity? I am truly befuddles as to WHY somebody would wear that if it so obviously horribly unflattering.

Maybe it's just me. Maybe it's not unflattering, it looks great and I'm just crazy and out of touch. Tailoring is in the eye of the beholder?
Reply With Quote
  #64   ^
Old Thu, Jul-02-15, 15:54
WereBear's Avatar
WereBear WereBear is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 14,684
 
Plan: EpiPaleo/Primal/LowOx
Stats: 220/130/150 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 129%
Location: USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KDH
Maybe it's just me. Maybe it's not unflattering, it looks great and I'm just crazy and out of touch. Tailoring is in the eye of the beholder?


A lot of these styles require a certain body type and is unforgiving with other kinds. In addition, a lot of these things are fussed over and photoshopped so it's not like they are even flattering from all angles, in truth.
Reply With Quote
  #65   ^
Old Thu, Jul-02-15, 16:54
JAnn's Avatar
JAnn JAnn is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 4,039
 
Plan: LC/GF/IF
Stats: 237.0/223.6/174.6 Female 5 ft 10 in
BF:42%.
Progress: 21%
Location: Central Arizona
Default

I am one of those who was made to wear black because it was slimming. I remember a special event at school where my mother made a new outfit all in black. It upset my teacher that I had to do that. And I was all of 11 years old, don't look good in black and wasn't obese.

On another topic, does anyone remember a WW recipe that called for latkes with a green bean topping? It called for mashing a slice of bread with an egg to make a latke and then blending green beans with something for the topping and then something else went on top of that. Forget the latke but I would appreciate the recipe of the green bean mix if anyone has it.
Reply With Quote
  #66   ^
Old Fri, Jul-03-15, 02:42
pazia pazia is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 374
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 00/00/00 Female 00
BF:
Progress:
Default

I don't remember the green bean topping, or a mock-latke; sounds like sort of like french toast. The recipes I remember making faithfully: blueberries and cottage cheese on a slice of bread, baked in oven for breakfast; tomato juice with a squeeze of lemon used as salad dressing over tuna; broiled canned button mushrooms (that was my after-school snack).

Tomato juice as salad dressing is really bad.

Posting on this thread and thinking about it, it occurs to me that the WW program in its early versions was dreamed up by people with no nutritional background at all, or mad scientists? The food choices and what was allowed/permitted just seem so arbitrary (aside from the obvious reduction in starch/carbs).
Reply With Quote
  #67   ^
Old Fri, Jul-03-15, 08:17
leemack's Avatar
leemack leemack is offline
NEVER GIVING UP!
Posts: 5,030
 
Plan: no sugar/grains LCHF IF
Stats: 478/354/200 Female 5' 9"
BF:excessive!!
Progress: 45%
Location: UK
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merpig
I came back recently from a family wedding in North Carolina. The bride had her best friend as maid of honor, and her two sisters as bridesmaids. The bride herself was thin, but the maid of honor was quite chubby and the two bridesmaids were both seriously obese.

If I was a bride who had chosen these attendants I think I would have made an effort to select dresses for them that were at least somewhat flattering to their body type. But NO, the dresses chosen were strapless and backless, with a bit of a scarf over one shoulder, and each dress seemed totally designed to show jiggly arms, rolls of back fat, huge tummies. Whatever happened to dressing to try to make the most of yourself rather than the least?

If I had been a bridesmaid in a situation like that I think I would have refused the honor rather than wear a dress like that!


It's sad but some brides apparently want their bridesmaids to not look their best in order to make themselves appear more attractive in comparison - or so I was told at my own wedding. My best friend who was my maid of honour always wore the same hairstyle, no make up and what she called 'mom' clothes. I picked a dress that was flattering to my two bridesmaids and arranged a makeover for my best friend (the other bridesmaid refused it) for wedding hair and make up and she looked so fantastic on the day and was inundated with compliments - I was so pleased for her. But I had at least ten people come up to me and tell me that I shouldn't have done this for her as it took the limelight off of me and that there was a reason bridesmaids' dresses are traditionally ugly. I didn't care - I had a special day which was made more special by the gift I was able to give my friend and enjoy all day long seeing her happiness.

But...it now wouldn't surprise me if some brides do deliberately pick unattractive dresses. I don't know why they would do this to their friends and family - but I know one woman who told her friends she was going to do them a favour by not choosing them as bridesmaids and then picked the least attractive family members and picked these yellow dresses that didn't suit any of them and had only one photo taken with the bridesmaids in.

I like to think that most of the women who choose unflattering dresses just have a poor sense of what works, but I suspect that some are seeing their obese bridesmaids trying on the bad dresses and thinking how much better they'll look in comparison.
Reply With Quote
  #68   ^
Old Fri, Jul-03-15, 10:13
Bonnie OFS Bonnie OFS is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,573
 
Plan: Dr. Bernstein
Stats: 188/150/135 Female 5 ft 4 inches
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: NE WA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by leemack
It's sad but some brides apparently want their bridesmaids to not look their best in order to make themselves appear more attractive in comparison - or so I was told at my own wedding.


I'm so glad my sister didn't do that. My only turn as a bridesmaid was at her wedding. It was early 70s so the dresses might look bad now - but by no means hideous - they were handmade by a relative & suited my other sis & myself pretty well.
Reply With Quote
  #69   ^
Old Sat, Jul-04-15, 08:02
Kinura Kinura is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 161
 
Plan: Composite/Atkins 1972
Stats: 220/196/180 Female 5'6"
BF:
Progress: 60%
Location: USA Great Lakes area
Default

A trend now -- and something my niece did at her wedding -- is to chose a particular fabric and each bridesmaid can have a dress made in that fabric in whatever style that suits her. It was really very lovely, and lots of fun to see the different styles.
Reply With Quote
  #70   ^
Old Sat, Jul-18-15, 10:19
Desert Mo's Avatar
Desert Mo Desert Mo is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,780
 
Plan: ZC Carnivore 100%
Stats: 170/147/140 Female 5'2"
BF:
Progress: 77%
Location: rural Arkansas
Default

I'm a lifetime member of Weight Watchers who left Weight Watchers when they went to the Plus system. I didn't need a "new" system. I'd already lost my excess weight on the original WW plan in the early 2000s. The new system seems to be designed mostly for people with poor eating habits who need to be weaned off candy, cookies, fastfood junk, etc., who apparently are incapable of following WW's simple guidance regarding good eating habits. My original large group of WW members has fairly much disappeared one by one due to shock & disappointment with WW over the radical changes they've made in the point system. Their system became so complicated, they needed members to use a small special calculator (that only they could sell) to figure out points. I began to lose interest in WW when they stopped using "members only" in their ads & started featuring so-called stars in them. Shame on WW. They deserve their present problems with maintaining membership. I was told all kinds of misleading information in WW meetings by the meeting leader about low-carb diets, especially anything named Atkins, as well as about food basics, such as a correct definition of what a "complex carb" is. I understand they use only lifetime members as group leaders, or did when I was active in WW, & once checked into the training program. I found out they pay very little but require extensive time in training so that everyone spouts the corporate approved information as well as dresses in NY style (no blue jeans, other casual wear they don't approve). I'm very disappointed in how far WW has degenerated from its origins, mostly due to bad management at the very top as well as a heavy-handed profit motive. This is my opinion, of course, based on my own experience over years with WW as a member, including as a lifetime member (meaning I achieved goal weight on WW). Your opinion or experience with WW may differ, of course. ~~ Desert Mo
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:36.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.