Tue, May-31-11, 13:05
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 7,582
|
|
Plan: EF/Fung IDM/keto
Stats: 375/225.4/175
BF:
Progress: 75%
Location: NE Florida
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beez in BR
Cholesterol 284 (Range: 0.199)
Triglycerides 53 (Range: 0 - 149)
HDL 69 (Range: 40 - 59)
LDL 204 (Range: 30-99)
My NMR lipo profile results weren't in yet, so we didn't get to argue about LDL particle size. They'll mail me the results when they come in.
|
So did the doctor immediately try to demand you go on statins with numbers like that? That's what my doctor did, for numbers almost identical to yours (total: 295, triglycerides: 49, HDL: 74, LDL: 201). She almost seemed to claim I'd fall over dead before I got out of her office with numbers like that - unless I immediately got on statins. But when I said I was sure that the numbers were a result of incomplete or non-existent T3 conversion she basically dismissed that as quackery.
That was the main reason I decided I would never go back to her, even if if meant doing without meds entirely. As for NMR - I bet your particle size is perfect since "good" (large fluffy) LDL is associated with high HDL and low tris, and "bad" (small, dense) LDL is associated with low HDL and high tris. Your HDL and tris alone are probably enough to suggest your LDL is the large, fluffy kind.
My doctor *did* agree to do the NMR test, after seeing the above numbers, after much urging and begging from me. But she pretty much ignored the results, said my LDL particle count was "too high" so it didn't matter what sort of LDL it was - though by getting a copy of the test results myself and going through them I was able to determine that LDL was 90% large and fluffy - which is about what would be expected with my HDL and tri numbers.
Anyway, good luck and let us know what results you get from the NMR. I just had blood test this morning after 2 weeks on Armour, so will be curious to see what my own numbers show.
|