Quote:
Originally Posted by Valtor
That's what I'm talking about. It's not about persistence or willpower. We have been led to believe it is, but it's really not. It's quite simply about eating the proper diet for the human race, then there is no need for artificial persistence or willpower. You just listen to your body. When you are hungry you eat. It can't be simpler. All you have to do is see the "food" that is not good for you as not food at all. It's not a question of cheating. It's just not food. For example sugar, it's not human food, it's barely something you can subsist on if you are starving.
Take a look at this post: http://forum.lowcarber.org/showpost...17&postcount=29
Patrick
|
I see where you're coming from, and sort of agree with you...yet sort of disagree with you.
I think an LC diet, for most people, is the single best way to control one's physical appetite. And if you're not hungry then, yes, that sort of takes "self-discipline" out of the equation. But just sort of.
Because even people who do have SUPER appetite control on paleo/LC diets, often quit the diet.
In fact, long-term drop out rates for BOTH paleo and and LC are very, very high. In spite of most people not being hungry on those diets. (Although some people absolutely ARE hungry on those diets.)
So even with profound appetite control theoretically making it "easy" to stick to an LC diet, many, many folks revert to eating chips, doughnuts, cake, etc. Probably most.
Do I know why? No I don't. But that is the way it seems to be.
It DOES take a great deal of discipline and perseverance to stick with even the best thought-out, appetite-controlling diets - such as LC/paleo.
It takes discipline to pay one's bills on time, exercise, keep a clean house etc. I believe most people lack discipline and perseverance. Those who have these qualities are rare, and tend to do much better than the median average in life.
Call me cynical...but that is my observation.