Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > Low-Carb War Zone
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16   ^
Old Tue, May-30-06, 13:03
kwikdriver's Avatar
kwikdriver kwikdriver is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,581
 
Plan: No grains, no sugar.
Stats: 001/045/525 Male 72
BF:
Progress: 8%
Default

Even a huckster gets it right sometimes.

http://www.mercola.com/townofallopath/index.htm
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #17   ^
Old Tue, May-30-06, 13:05
kwikdriver's Avatar
kwikdriver kwikdriver is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,581
 
Plan: No grains, no sugar.
Stats: 001/045/525 Male 72
BF:
Progress: 8%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CLASYS
But in a recent issue of the e-mailed newsletter, he now claims there is recent scientific evidence that "Atkins was wrong" and that his pet theory was right all along. [I though the real recent evidence was that Atkins was right?] Where does the guy get his claim to corroboration?

cjl


He's referring to the Barry Sears research that came out recently. There's a thread somewhere here about it, if you want to search for it.

After reading what he actually wrote, blaring out "Atkins wasn't right" is his idea of an attention grabbing headline; when you read the actual piece, it turns into him shilling his own plan again. He really is a worm, even if he does get it right sometimes.

Last edited by kwikdriver : Tue, May-30-06 at 13:17.
Reply With Quote
  #18   ^
Old Tue, May-30-06, 13:21
Nancy LC's Avatar
Nancy LC Nancy LC is offline
Experimenter
Posts: 25,868
 
Plan: DDF
Stats: 202/185.4/179 Female 67
BF:
Progress: 72%
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Equinox
I read the stuff about microwaves being dangerous years ago, but wasn't one of his main arguments that his MOTHER "instinctively" distrusted the thing when it came out? She couldn't have been just sceptical of any newfangled electronic/"magical" way to cook, could she, because she's HIS mother, so I guess that makes her a psychic....

LOL! I read that too, thought the same thing. My Mother is many things but "always right" isn't one of them. I remember him quoting his mother saying that coffee reheated in the microwave didn't taste good. Well, reheated coffee just doesn't taste as good as fresh, you dolt!
Reply With Quote
  #19   ^
Old Tue, May-30-06, 17:37
CLASYS's Avatar
CLASYS CLASYS is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 164
 
Plan: Atkins original diet
Stats: 245/210/175 Male 5'6"
BF:
Progress: 50%
Location: New York
Default Barry Sears?

I found forum references to Barry Sears, but what is the "new research" supposedly making Atkins "not right"?

A side issue: In searching the forum on Sears, I found a reference to a Madelyn Fernstrom, apparently in disagreement with the good Dr. Sears.

I saw this woman on TV and I cannot definitively determine where she stands on LC. I don't believe she was particularly pitching anything, but from what little I saw, couldn't determine if she is a defender of the carb status quo or otherwise. Anyone with info?

cjl
Reply With Quote
  #20   ^
Old Tue, May-30-06, 17:58
sailsouth sailsouth is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 78
 
Plan: General Controlled Carb
Stats: 225/180/180 Male 185 centimetres
BF:
Progress: 100%
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CLASYS
I found forum references to Barry Sears, but what is the "new research" supposedly making Atkins "not right"?


http://forum.lowcarber.org/showthre...t=296760&page=1
Reply With Quote
  #21   ^
Old Wed, May-31-06, 01:14
CLASYS's Avatar
CLASYS CLASYS is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 164
 
Plan: Atkins original diet
Stats: 245/210/175 Male 5'6"
BF:
Progress: 50%
Location: New York
Default

Thanks for the reference. I suspect Mercola would also find some way to bash Sears as well, since according to Mercola, the only method that does work is Mercola's.

But clearly he will use any scrap of a study to disprove anyone else, spinning the attacks until he is the only one left standing.

Can anyone find a study that Mercola's method is wrong?

Mercola update:

He is now selling a non-dietary systematic approach to success. In essence, he is proving the 80/20 "rule" applies to just about everything, so you should apply it into your life.

I first encountered the 80/20 rule in the '70's when the quality of a lot of things went downhill:

1) If you sell a product with poor quality control, only 20% of the people will ever make any complaint whatsoever; 80% will just shrug their shoulders.

2) It doesn't matter how many bugs there are in Windows because 80% of the population will never be able to notice any problems.

3) It doesn't matter how many problems there are in Microsoft Office, since 80% of the population uses 20% of the features available.

I guess the only useful application here is that if 20% of your diet is carbs, then 80% of us will get fat

cjl
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:47.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.