Wed, Oct-26-05, 21:13
|
|
Fully Caffeinated
Posts: 17,245
|
|
Plan: Back to Atkins
Stats: 298/228/160
BF:?/35/?
Progress: 51%
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by notskinny
I do understand eating more than Induction Level Carbs. Or doing what works for you. And I understand that we're all different too. That's what great about these forums. We all share things that work for us and can learn from each other. BUT, If I was doing my own thing, and let's say I was eating Pasta, every other night, and I wasn't losing weight, then maybe I'd cut out the pasta, or whatever it is that is NOT on the Low Carb Menu? Does that make sense?
|
You bet it does... so when they ask people to evaluate "their own thing" menu, it's the perfect opportunity to bring up that fact.
I personally feel a person needs to read, read, read, then you have a good base of knowledge to draw on when you need to change things later on down the road. Some people go by trial and error, and others just start by cutting out sugar and work their way down from there. If they get frustrated winging it, they might be ready to do some research and they might start that ball rolling by asking a few opinions.
Val, you're right. I shouldn't give a rat's rump if someone else thinks I'm doing Atkins, Half-Asskins, or FatAsskins. <shrug> It just got old hearing it. The finger-wagging and assumptions I hadn't even read the book when I could practically, at one point, quote DANDR chapter and verse... because I experimented with CAD, then started applying what I learned to my own situation. I realized that even though I didn't agree with everything the authors of CAD had to say, I did lose better if I cut out snacks, and I could still lose adding certain carbs to certain meals (like my breakfast) but then you get "Dr Atkins says...."
I've even read "Low Carb Dieting For Dummies" and *gasp* applied some of the Dr Phil system into my plan... and I'm finally getting going again after some hard times.
To each "Their Own" I guess.
|