Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Daily Low-Carb Support > General Low-Carb
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #136   ^
Old Fri, Jul-06-07, 07:48
Muata's Avatar
Muata Muata is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 277
 
Plan: Ketogenic/Paleolithic
Stats: 310/179/175 Male 71
BF:44%/6%/5%
Progress: 97%
Location: Irvine, CA
Default

Rightnow, I'm going to try and keep my posts a little shorter because I tend the blather on sometimes. I know that there have been recent studies since the 60s (LOL!), but I was talking about the foundational study that the whole carb cycling/loading theory is based on.

I think this interview with Dr. Ellis is worth reading:
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/mahler11.htm

Also, it is the scientific community's notion that calories count, not mine. I didn't come up with this theory on my own. As a matter of fact, as I've posted in other threads, I didn't count calories for a couple of years on my journey; however, I came to a point that if I wanted to lose more weight or really achieve my goal, I had to keep track of how much food I put into my pie hole. LOL! Ask any nutritional scientists; this is accepted as fact, and I find it hard to believe that people still debate this issue. All the controlled clinical studies that have been done show this. In addition, we are talking about folks who also exercise; this is one point that Tom Venuto drives home and all the people who have succeeded on his program. I would say it is much less about carb loading and cycling, which is not the same thing as glycogen replenishing (please go to Colpo's forum to read up on this because he clearly delineates the differences), as it is that they exercise (weight resistance and cardio) and count calories.

Actually, we can agree to disagree Rightnow (hey that's pretty funny how your handle fit into this sentence--LOL!) on the calorie issue. However, I think that there are a lot more "most people" on this forum than you suspect.

Thanks for your post and I can't wait to watch your results as you continue on your journey. BTW, did you check out the site that I mentioned in my earlier post? I've been in contact with Mike, who started his journey at 440lbs. and besides the points I've made that I disagree with Venuto's approach, we are on the same page about counting calories and exercising; they go hand in hand.

Yes, I'm familiar with the other Mike's story--very motivating too! I love his "How bad do you want it?" attitude! Anyone losing over 100 pounds is truly an inspiration to me, and that includes you too Rightnow!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #137   ^
Old Tue, Jul-10-07, 12:09
arc's Avatar
arc arc is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,186
 
Plan: Meat Only
Stats: 200/169.6/175 Male 5'11''
BF:
Progress: 122%
Location: Eastern WA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElleH
There is an author by the name of Joyce Vedral...she uses a method of light weights but it's still very difficult and will work your muscles very hard because you actively squeeze the muscle very hard when you work it. It works!


You can actually do the same thing without the weight. The weight is just a prop for form, etc. Check out http://www.transformetrics.com for more info. They have some free e-books that talk about techniques and routines.
Reply With Quote
  #138   ^
Old Tue, Jul-10-07, 22:57
FenwayGuy's Avatar
FenwayGuy FenwayGuy is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 149
 
Plan: CKD/Carb Cycling
Stats: 240/231/220 Male 5'7"
BF:19.7%/15.3%/10%
Progress: 45%
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arc
You can actually do the same thing without the weight. The weight is just a prop for form, etc. Check out http://www.transformetrics.com for more info. They have some free e-books that talk about techniques and routines.



arc,

Thanks for the link. Excellent looking site for alternative workout routines. I see lots of references to oldtime strongmen and bodybuilders.

Just another tool to add to the arsenal
Reply With Quote
  #139   ^
Old Wed, Jul-11-07, 07:37
Muata's Avatar
Muata Muata is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 277
 
Plan: Ketogenic/Paleolithic
Stats: 310/179/175 Male 71
BF:44%/6%/5%
Progress: 97%
Location: Irvine, CA
Default

I second that! I found a great isometric exercise for my neck on that site that I'm definitely going to add to my "bag of tricks" . . .
Reply With Quote
  #140   ^
Old Wed, Jul-11-07, 15:36
arc's Avatar
arc arc is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,186
 
Plan: Meat Only
Stats: 200/169.6/175 Male 5'11''
BF:
Progress: 122%
Location: Eastern WA
Default

Glad that you liked them. John Peterson's books are all excellent too, particularly the Isometric Revolution one (I do ignore the nutritional advice in them, though ).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:57.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.