Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Wed, May-19-04, 10:59
gotbeer's Avatar
gotbeer gotbeer is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 2,889
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 280/203/200 Male 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 96%
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Default "The Lowdown on Sweet"

The Lowdown on Sweet

By Jon Robison, PhD, MS Published 05/18/2004

TCS
http://www.techcentralstation.com/051804F.html

Sugar has definitely gotten a bad rap over the years. It has been blamed for causing (among other things) tooth decay, obesity, diabetes and heart disease. Furthermore, it is common knowledge as reported by parents, teachers and other experts that children become hyperactive after they eat candy and other sugary foods. Indeed, the dangers of sugar have become legendary. Its damaging effects have even been compared to those of another white powder by a well-known consumer advocate group, and an entire industry -- non-sugar sweeteners -- has grown up around the fear produced by the legend. What is it about this wonderful-tasting stuff that inspires such trepidation?

Sugars 101

With carbohydrates and especially sugars being in the news so often recently, it can be confusing to pin down exactly what the terms mean. Sugars are referred to as simple carbohydrates to distinguish them from complex carbohydrates such as starches. The monosaccharides glucose, fructose and galactose combine in pairs called disaccharides to form the most common sugars as shown below:

Monosaccharide Disaccharide Food Source
Sucrose = glucose + fructose (sugar cane, honey, corn syrup)

Lactose = glucose + galactose (milk products)

Maltose = glucose + glucose (malt from grains)

Sugars are further classified as being either naturally occurring -- such as the fructose in fruit or the lactose in milk; or added -- such as the sucrose or other refined sugars that are incorporated into pop and fruit drinks. In examining the relationship between sugars and human health, the most important facts to remember may be that 1) most dietary sugars (and most complex carbohydrates as well) are eventually broken down into the monosaccharide glucose and 2) the body cannot distinguish between sugars that are added to foods and sugars that occur naturally in foods. (1)

Don't Sweat The Sweet Stuff

So what does the research say about the relationship between dietary sugar and human health? Perhaps surprisingly, there is little evidence to support sugar as the dangerous villain that it has been made out to be. Below are some of the most important findings in that regard.

1) Sugar and Heart Disease: The etiology of heart disease is complicated; in fact, there are currently more than 300 identified risk factors. However, diets high in carbohydrates and low in fats provide the cornerstone of dietary recommendations for preventing coronary heart disease. In general, an increase in dietary carbohydrate is associated with a decrease in dietary fats. Research does not support the suggestion that carbohydrates in general or sugars in particular contribute to the etiology of heart disease as the following statements from a variety of prestigious health organizations indicate.

U.S. Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization:

"There is no evidence for a causal role of sucrose in the etiology of coronary heart disease (2)

American Heart Association:

"There are no dietary trials linking sugar consumption and CVD…" (3)

2) Sugar and Obesity. Too many calories from any food will eventually cause weight gain, but per gram, fat is much more likely to do this than sugar. Each gram of fat contributes about 9 calories while each gram of carbohydrate (complex or simple) contributes about 4 to total energy intake. As a recent review of the literature in Family Economics and Nutrition Review concluded,

Many factors contribute to obesity, but evidence does not single out dietary sugar as a cause." (4)

Perhaps surprisingly, a number of population studies actually demonstrate an inverse relationship between sugar consumption and obesity. (5-7) Furthermore, the ability of the body to store carbohydrates is limited and excess intake causes an increase in the amount of carbohydrate burned for energy, whereas excess fat intake does not generally increase fat oxidation. Finally, research indicates that excess fat calories are readily converted to body fat stores while the body only rarely changes excess carbohydrates into fat. (8) Therefore "as fat is stored more efficiently than excess carbohydrate, use of high carbohydrate foods is likely to reduce the risk of obesity in the long term" (2)

3) Sugar and Diabetes. Contrary to much popular wisdom, The American Diabetic Association (ADA) contends that sugar does not cause diabetes, does not make it more difficult to control and can certainly be used as a part of a balanced diet for a person with Diabetes. Clinical studies that have manipulated the amount of sucrose in the diet have generally found no adverse effects of sucrose on average glucose control. (9-11) Therefore, in a recent Position Statement entitled Evidence-Based Nutrition Principles and Recommendations for the Treatment and Prevention of Diabetes and Related Complications, the ADA concluded that: (12)

"Intake of sucrose and sucrose containing foods by people with diabetes does not need to be restricted because of concern about aggravating hyperglycemia."

This is certainly not meant to suggest that individuals with diabetes do not need to be aware of their carbohydrate/sugar intake. Careful monitoring of all carbohydrates and adequate covering with insulin or other glucose-lowering medication when necessary is essential for the ongoing health of these individuals. However, the research consensus to date on the relationship of dietary sugar to diabetes is clearly stated by the World Health Organization:

"Sucrose and other sugars have not been directly implicated in the etiology of diabetes." (2)

4) Sugar and Hyperactivity in Children. Perhaps the most pervasive myth surrounding sugar concerns its supposed untoward effects on children. Parents and teachers especially have been convinced that sugary treats result in out of control children. It is not hard to imagine how this myth developed. Parents taking their young children to birthday parties where the kids eat cake and ice cream noticed that they proceeded to get quite rowdy. By association, it was assumed that the food was the culprit. Unfortunately, a more controlled observation might have discovered what was more likely to have been the truth; that the same rowdiness would have occurred even sans sugar. In fact, a recent, in-depth review of the research relating to sugar intake and children's behavior concluded: (13)

"Twelve double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of sugar challenges failed to provide any evidence that sugar ingestion leads to untoward behavior in children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder or in normal children."

Perhaps ironically, the most recent research actually suggests that, far from being a hyperactivity-inducing food, sweets actually appear to play a significant role in helping to calm us down when we are stressed. It turns out that both high sugar and high fat foods are capable of turning off our metabolic responses to chronic stress, decreasing the potential damaging effects of excess stress hormones. (14)

5) Sugar and Dental Caries. All foods containing starches and/or sugars are easily broken down in the mouth to produce acid which in turn increases the risk of dental caries. This risk however, is highly variable among individuals, depending on a host of factors including oral bacteria, saliva, tooth enamel, food substrate, genetic susceptibility, type of food and frequency of consumption. Therefore, although sugar is most certainly involved in tooth decay, research suggests that "good oral hygiene, good genes, fluoridation of water and restricting snacks between meals can prevent tooth decay, no matter how high the sugar consumption." (4)

Sweetening The Pot

Like so many other food-related issues, what is missing in relation to sugar is largely a matter of balance. There is little evidence that sugar is a dangerous food that needs to be treated as if it were a controlled substance. While high intakes can certainly affect oral health and displace other important nutrients in the diet, the same can be said of almost any food eaten in excess. Sugar is a good source of quick energy for our bodies and for our brains as well.

Perhaps even more importantly, sugar adds sweetness and taste to our foods. This enables us to enjoy a wider variety of foods and helps to make those foods more palatable. Most people would consider strawberries to be a very healthy food. Yet strawberries, particularly in the off-season, may not be sweet enough to attract the attention of some people, particularly young children. However, a quick dipping in sugar permits the full sweetness of the nutritious fruit to come forth and allows us to get the benefits of its vitamin C and other nutrients. The world can be a bitter place sometimes. Perhaps this is why sweets are one of the few innate food preferences that we have as human beings.

References

1. Murphy S, Johnson R. The scientific basis of recent US guidance on sugars intake. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2003;78(4):827S-833S.

2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States and the World Health Organization. Carbohydrates in Human Nutrition. 1998; (FAO Food and Nutrition Paper - 66) Chapter 3, Dietary Carbohydrate and disease.

3. Howard B, Wylie-Rosett J. Sugar and Cardiovascular Disease: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From The Committee on Nutrition of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;106:523-527.

4. Mardis, A. Current knowledge of the health effects of sugar. Family Economics and Nutrition Review; Washington; 2001;13(1):87-91.

5. Gibney, M., Siman-Grant, M., Stanton, J., Keast, D. Consumption of Sugars. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 62(1 suppl):178S-193S.

6. Gibson, S., Williams, S. Dental caries in pre-school children: Associations with Social Class, tooth brushing habit and consumption of sugars and sugar-containing food. Further analysis of data from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of children aged 1.5-4.5 years. Caries Research 33(2):101-113.

7. Ruxton, C., Garceau, F., Cottrell R. Guidelines for Sugar Consumption in Europe: Is a quantitative approach justified? European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1999;53(7):503-513.

8. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States and the World Health Organization. Carbohydrates in Human Nutrition. 1998; (FAO Food and Nutrition Paper - 66) Chapter 2, The Role of Carbohydrates in Maintenance of Health.

9. Bantle, J., Swanson, J., Thomas, W., et al. Metabolic effects of dietary fructose and sucrose in types I and II diabetic subjects. Diabetes Care 1993;16:1301-1305.

10. Bantle, J., Swanson, J., Thomas, W., etal. Metabolic effects of dietary fructose and sucrose in types I and II diabetic subjects. JAMA 1986;256:3241-3246.

11. Wise, J., Kleim, K., Huisinga, J., et al. Effect of sucrose-containing snacks on blood glucose control. Diabetes Care 1989;12:423-426.

12. American Diabetes Association Position Statement. Evidence-Based Nutrition Principles and Recommendations for the Treatment and Prevention of Diabetes and Related Complications. Diabetes Care 2002;25(1):202-212.

13. Krummel, D., Seligson F., Guthrie, H. Hyperacticity: Is candy causal? Critical Review of Food Science and Nutrition 1996;36(1-2):31-47

14. Dallman, M. Pecoraro, N., Akana, S., et. al. Chronic Stress and Obesity: A New View of "Comfort Food." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2003;100(20):11696-11701.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Wed, May-19-04, 11:14
DebPenny's Avatar
DebPenny DebPenny is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 1,514
 
Plan: TSP/PPLP/low-cal/My own
Stats: 250/209/150 Female 63.5 inches
BF:
Progress: 41%
Location: Sacramento, CA
Default Chalk one up for the sugar industry

What a crock! They blame the symptoms of over-consumption of sugars and other carbs on other symptoms. That way they draw your attention away from the real cause. Talk about convoluted logic.

Last edited by DebPenny : Wed, May-19-04 at 11:32.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Wed, May-19-04, 11:21
Groggy60's Avatar
Groggy60 Groggy60 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 486
 
Plan: IF/Low carb
Stats: 219/201/172 Male 70 inches
BF:
Progress: 38%
Location: Ottawa, ON
Default

When my little boy was 2.75 years old, he had his first exposure to chocolate in a big way. It was amazing to see how he started boucing off the walls after he ate a fair amount of chocolate. It was more than a little obvious that it was the chocolate and not the situation that made him go hyper. I often wonder when people make such comments if they actually have children themselves.
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Wed, May-19-04, 11:34
patricia52's Avatar
patricia52 patricia52 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 730
 
Plan: Atkins Nutritional Plan
Stats: 194/165/145 Female 66
BF:39/37/28
Progress: 59%
Location: Vancouver
Default

Gotbeer, you probably are better at looking this up than me, but I remember reading an article a couple of months ago. It said that the WHO had presented a report to the UN on epidemic obesity in third-world countries. The population was going from malnourished to obese in one generation because of sugar. Just sugar.
But the US government refused to accept the report. The huge (and generous) sugar lobby got to them, and demanded that the report be re-written to be "sweeter" to the sugar interests.
Looks like they've been working overtime.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Wed, May-19-04, 11:37
CLASYS's Avatar
CLASYS CLASYS is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 164
 
Plan: Atkins original diet
Stats: 245/210/175 Male 5'6"
BF:
Progress: 50%
Location: New York
Default

With the success of Atkins as a major player in the diet world, the LF people are getting more desparate. There are even reports that consumption of orange juice is down, so those growers of sugar aren't making their accustomed profits any more. [Too bad!]

This is just one of those political mantra things. Chalk it up to a lie often told may eventually be believed by the masses.

cjl (Isn't sugar real useful to sabotage somebody's car with? You just place it in the gas tank, etc.)
Reply With Quote
  #6   ^
Old Wed, May-19-04, 11:43
gotbeer's Avatar
gotbeer gotbeer is offline
Registered Member
Posts: 2,889
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 280/203/200 Male 69 inches
BF:
Progress: 96%
Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by patricia52
Gotbeer, you probably are better at looking this up than me, but I remember reading an article a couple of months ago. It said that the WHO had presented a report to the UN on epidemic obesity in third-world countries. The population was going from malnourished to obese in one generation because of sugar. Just sugar.
But the US government refused to accept the report. The huge (and generous) sugar lobby got to them, and demanded that the report be re-written to be "sweeter" to the sugar interests.
Looks like they've been working overtime.


There are lots of such articles; here is one:

http://forum.lowcarber.org/showthread.php?t=166920
Reply With Quote
  #7   ^
Old Wed, May-19-04, 17:49
CindySue48's Avatar
CindySue48 CindySue48 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 2,816
 
Plan: Atkins/Protein Power
Stats: 256/179/160 Female 68 inches
BF:38.9/27.2/24.3
Progress: 80%
Location: Triangle NC
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Groggy60
When my little boy was 2.75 years old, he had his first exposure to chocolate in a big way. It was amazing to see how he started boucing off the walls after he ate a fair amount of chocolate. It was more than a little obvious that it was the chocolate and not the situation that made him go hyper. I often wonder when people make such comments if they actually have children themselves.


My son, right from day 1, was probably the most laid back and happy child ever born. He just loved to laugh. And he'd rather site still than crawl around, etc.

On the morning of his first birthday party his sister (3 1/2) got up early and fed him the icing and candy decorations off his cake! It was a big 1/2 sheet cake....and she scooped off most of the edge...a little bit of cake, but mostly frosting. They both ate it, not just him, but he was the only one with a reaction.

When I went in to get him he looked like he was on speed! He was bouncing up and down, his eyes were wild looking, and he was screaming and yelling. Initially he was laughing, almost uncontrolably, then he started crying and carrying on....for several hours! When he finally crashed he slept for several hours, and was cranky all the rest of the day.

No....sugar has NO EFFECT on kids! Not at all!

Like the article said "it is common knowledge as reported by parents, teachers and other experts that children become hyperactive after they eat candy and other sugary foods" It's common knowledge because it's true....at least with some kids.
Reply With Quote
  #8   ^
Old Wed, May-19-04, 23:51
mcsblues mcsblues is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 690
 
Plan: Protein Power
Stats: 250/190/185 Male 6' 1"
BF:30+/16/15
Progress: 92%
Location: Australia
Default

"Finally, research indicates that excess fat calories are readily converted to body fat stores while the body only rarely changes excess carbohydrates into fat. (8) Therefore "as fat is stored more efficiently than excess carbohydrate, use of high carbohydrate foods is likely to reduce the risk of obesity in the long term" (2)"

WOW ! - This from a Phd and Master of Science - if only we had known!

Both references refer to;

"Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States and the World Health Organization. Carbohydrates in Human Nutrition. 1998; (FAO Food and Nutrition Paper - 66) Chapter 2, The Role of Carbohydrates in Maintenance of Health.

and Chapter 3 - Dietary Carbohydrate and disease"

- they wouldn't be the same people who gave us the food pyramid would they?? (with helpful assistance from the vegetable oil and sugar industry bodies)

Cheers,

Malcolm
Reply With Quote
  #9   ^
Old Thu, May-20-04, 07:51
K Walt K Walt is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 606
 
Plan: PP
Stats: 210/170/170
BF:
Progress: 100%
Location: NJ
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcsblues
"Finally, research indicates that excess fat calories are readily converted to body fat stores while the body only rarely changes excess carbohydrates into fat. (8) Therefore "as fat is stored more efficiently than excess carbohydrate, use of high carbohydrate foods is likely to reduce the risk of obesity in the long term" (2)"


Hey wait a second. I thought ALL CALORIES are the same. The dieticians and nutritionists ALL SAY that it doesn't matter where the calories come from.

Yet here we have one saying that CARB CALORIES DO NOT work like other calories????

Is somebody confused here?? How can they say this and still say that a calorie is a calorie???
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Low Carb Lowdown: Sorting out the truth and judging the tastes of products..." gotbeer LC Research/Media 2 Tue, Feb-24-04 09:43
More from NYT/Marian Burros: "The Post-Atkins Low Carb Diet" gotbeer LC Research/Media 4 Wed, Jan-21-04 13:16
"The Widening of America, or How Size 4 Became a Size 0" gotbeer LC Research/Media 6 Tue, Jan-20-04 13:46
Forbes: "The Atkins Guide To Stock Picking" gotbeer LC Research/Media 0 Tue, Jan-20-04 12:28
"The Lowdown on Low Carb Diets" gotbeer LC Research/Media 4 Mon, May-12-03 15:16


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:33.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.