I have seen a lot of time the succesfull results of people following both, a low-carb diet and a raw foo diet. Those diets are very good.
Picture of the succesfull results in a raw-food diet:
http://www.rawandjuicy.com/images/s...oreandafter.gif
http://www.welikeitraw.com/photos/u...ercookedraw.jpg
http://eatfreshfood.com/pageimages/b4after.jpg
About the low-carb diet anyone can find in this forum a lot of pictures.
My question is... Is really important the amount of carbs? or the Glycemic Index? I know both are very important, but I think the GI is more important than the amount of carbs.
The weight gain is mainly based on the insulin response, instead of the total amount or carbs intake. We know that all processed carbs are poison.
I post this because each time I start a low carb, high protein moderate-high fat diet, I don't feel enough good. I have performed a lot of tests about dieting and sometime I was in a ketosis (fat-burning mode) while eating a lot of vegetables and some fruit. So, I think the GI is more important than the amount of carbs.
Maybe the key is Non-processed Low GI carbs instead of Non processed Low-Carb diet???
If we eat a good/big amount of NATURAL LOW GI carbs, we can lose fat because the total "calorie" intake is related to the metabolism. High "calorie" intake
per meal = Fast metabolism.
Maybe the key is high GI produces a lot of acid waste in the body and the insulin peaks suck minerals and nutrients from our organism, and low GI not.
I know the bigger meal, the low TOTAL GI. So, when we eat more, the total GI is lower. But that isn't good explained in the GI Theory books.
We aren't overweight, we're Over Acid!!!