Active Low-Carber Forums
Atkins diet and low carb discussion provided free for information only, not as medical advice.
Home Plans Tips Recipes Tools Stories Studies Products
Active Low-Carber Forums
A sugar-free zone


Welcome to the Active Low-Carber Forums.
Support for Atkins diet, Protein Power, Neanderthin (Paleo Diet), CAD/CALP, Dr. Bernstein Diabetes Solution and any other healthy low-carb diet or plan, all are welcome in our lowcarb community. Forget starvation and fad diets -- join the healthy eating crowd! You may register by clicking here, it's free!

Go Back   Active Low-Carber Forums > Main Low-Carb Diets Forums & Support > Low-Carb Studies & Research / Media Watch > LC Research/Media
User Name
Password
FAQ Members Calendar Search Gallery My P.L.A.N. Survey


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   ^
Old Wed, Nov-05-03, 16:52
doreen T's Avatar
doreen T doreen T is offline
Forum Founder
Posts: 37,300
 
Plan: LC, GF
Stats: 241/185/140 Female 165 cm
BF:
Progress: 55%
Location: Eastern ON, Canada
Default Bill would force restaurants to list fat, calories

Bill would force restaurants to list fat, calories

Last Updated: 2003-11-05 16:18:41 -0400 (Reuters Health)

By Maggie Fox

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Federal legislation introduced on Wednesday would force fast-food and other chain restaurants to display how many calories and how much fat and sodium customers are getting in each item.

Connecticut Democratic Rep. Rosa DeLauro introduced the bill, called the Menu Education and Labeling or MEAL bill, in the House. Iowa Democratic Sen. Tom Harkin said he would introduce a similar measure in the Senate.

The bill applies to standard menu items offered by chains with 20 or more outlets. If passed, it would affect groups such as Yum Brands Inc., which operates Taco Bell, Pizza Hut and Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurants, McDonald's, Denny's.

"Obesity is one of our nation's most pressing health issues," DeLauro told a news conference. "This bill ... will give consumers the necessary nutritional information to make healthy choices for themselves."

More than two-thirds of U.S. adults are overweight or obese and thus at higher risk of heart disease, diabetes and some forms of cancer.

The food and restaurant industry has argued that a lack of exercise is just as responsible, if not more responsible, for the trend.

But DeLauro said eating out is also to blame.

She noted that Americans spend 46 percent of food dollars in restaurants now as compared to 26 percent in 1970.

"And studies have shown that children eat almost twice as many calories when they eat at a restaurant as they do when they eat at home," DeLauro said.

At the same time, the Center for Science in the Public Interest published a poll showing that Americans want this information.

CUSTOMERS WANT TO KNOW

"People have come to expect nutritional information in markets and the poll we are releasing today shows that two-thirds of people expect it in restaurants," the CSPI's Margo Wootan said in an interview.

The CSPI telephone survey of 600 adults showed 67 percent support the idea of requiring fast-food restaurants to display the calorie content of their foods on menus and menu boards.

The survey, with a margin of error of four points, showed that 36 percent strongly support the idea.

The CSPI notes that between 1978 and 1995, the average person's daily calorie intake rose by 167 calories, from 1,876 to 2,043 calories. If not countered by exercise, this is more than enough to lay on an extra pound every month.

The 1990 Nutrition Labeling and Education Act put nutritional information on the labels of packaged foods but restaurants are exempted.

The restaurant industry argues that this makes sense when the ingredients of meals change from day to day.

"This legislation wouldn't affect restaurants with fewer than 20 outlets, so mom and pop diners and fancy gourmet restaurants would not be required to test or label anything," Wootan said.

"A McDonald's Big Mac has 590 calories no matter where you get it." The CSPI said people have no idea just how calorie-laden many items are.

"Everyone knows that the vegetable of the day is better than french fries ... but I think people would be surprised to learn that french fries have 10 times as many calories," Wootan said.

"I think this bill will pass," she added. "It'll just be a matter of how many years it will take to pass it."

The National Restaurant Association said the bill was unnecessary.


http://www.reutershealth.com/archiv...105elin024.html
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2   ^
Old Wed, Nov-05-03, 17:36
Ghost's Avatar
Ghost Ghost is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 146
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 190/147/145 Female 5'5"
BF:
Progress: 96%
Location: Southern Ontario
Default

Too bad that they won't be made to list carb counts.
Reply With Quote
  #3   ^
Old Wed, Nov-05-03, 17:52
TarHeel's Avatar
TarHeel TarHeel is offline
Give chance a chance
Posts: 16,944
 
Plan: General LC maintenance
Stats: 152.6/115.6/115 Female 60 inches
BF:28%
Progress: 98%
Location: North Carolina
Default

Quote:
Too bad that they won't be made to list carb counts.

Almost all of them do if you go to their websites. I'm all for voluntary, not mandatory, nutritional or any other information. We don't need any more political police. The fast food companies are learning what their customers want, and they are clearly aware we lc-ers are out here. Every day I see new evidence that they know "if they offer it, we will come." Just keep saying "Hold the bun, hold the ketchup."

Kay
Reply With Quote
  #4   ^
Old Wed, Nov-05-03, 18:00
diemde's Avatar
diemde diemde is offline
Posts: 7,547
 
Plan: lower carb
Stats: 333/199.8/172 Female 5'8"
BF:??/39.0/25
Progress: 83%
Location: Central Ohio
Default

I agree with Kay - keep the politicians out of it. We have too much legislation as it is! Good customer service is finding out what your customers want and then providing it. Not only do they have the websites, they have those little nutrition booklets at most of the restaurants too.
Reply With Quote
  #5   ^
Old Wed, Nov-05-03, 18:25
chef's Avatar
chef chef is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 109
 
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 215/150/?? Male 5' 11
BF:25%/17%/<10%
Progress:
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Default

I start getting worried when the government starts trying to legislate what and how we eat. The FDA's idea of what is healthy is so far skewed that if they did decided to start forcing people to eat "healthier" by mandating fat content of foods or charging extra taxes on fatty foods like they do with tobacco, it would only hurt us low carbers. I know we are just talking about information right now, but it is still a step down that path.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What if It's All Been a Big Fat Lie? deelight_99 LC Research/Media 70 Mon, Jul-09-18 07:16
[CKD] CKD 101 Trainerdan Specific Exercise Plans 98 Thu, Nov-21-13 21:08
Review: "The Fat Girl's Guide to Life" gotbeer LC Research/Media 8 Tue, Feb-14-06 20:00
CKD 101 Trainerdan Plan comparison 3 Thu, May-22-03 13:28
Fumento Upset with LC Research: Hold the Lard! tamarian LC Research/Media 18 Sat, Dec-07-02 12:11


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 14:45.


Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.