Mon, Jul-18-05, 08:08
|
Senior Member
Posts: 216
|
|
Plan: Atkins
Stats: 195/178/150
BF:
Progress: 38%
Location: Northampton, Massachusett
|
|
The problem is that studies which have compared low carb to, say, WW, have treated them both as "diets." Atkins is not a diet, it is not just some semantic quibble that it is referred to as a "nutritional approach." Not only it is possible to follow Atkins principles -- rigidity is not necessary, but awareness is -- for the rest of one's life, it is actually a happy prospect, at least for many of us. It is not a vision of deprivation. Diets are generally deprivation.
The confusion comes because Atkins does involve a "diet" at the beginning. Studies take a presumably unbiased sample of people and *put* them on this or that diet, and probably also have a control group that eats ad libitem, i.e., whatever they like, as usual. It is utterly unsurprising that these people, nearly all of them, gain the weight back. They went on a diet. It is highly unlikely that the bulk of them actually found and continued to follow the Atkins Nutritional Approach. Even if the "diet" was supposedly Atkins-derived.
|