Quote:
Originally Posted by ysabella
A lot of the reason that I participate in forum discussions is so I will delve deeper into various topics. For example, I like talking over current events on forums, as I get other points of view and I end up digging deeper into the circumstances. Hanging around here, I've learned buckets about various nutritional theories - but since I'm a skeptic I tend to get into piles of research on various topics and often seem to rub people the wrong way in the process, if I come off as opposing them (which I'm not always trying to do, or sometimes trying to do just to provide a counterpoint). I don't take it terribly seriously, nor personally, but I've put people on Ignore if I decided there was no point in talking to them.
|
I think dieting involves a lot of
faith, which is something skeptics by definition lack. This is good in some circumstances. After all, most people have faith, because they've been told over and over again, that the best way to loose weight is to reduce the amount of fat in ones diet. They've been told that they will
weaken and die if they don't have the "fuel" that only grains can provide.
Most people are either internal or external sorters and won't change. Internal sorters are natural skeptics, on the whole. What is true is what is true for them. External sorters are people who arrive at truth by way of consensus or by being told by a Trusted Person.
I've recently decided to make the move from external to internal sorter. I've learned the key is to not look back when you've found the truth. One popular phrase these days is "question everything," but not everything needs questioning. Once we have found something to be real and workable, we don't need to question it.
I stopped NeanderThin out of peer pressure, mostly from people I am no longer associated with anyway. Because I externally sorted, the first hundred pounds I lost was meaningless. It wasn't true for "them," so it wasn't true for me.
I find you, personally, easier to deal with when I remember I'm now sorting everything internally. You're not trying to override "my truth" with "your truth." Rather, you're telling me what you've found and
inviting me to test it.
I'd rather see a disagreement from you than a bland agreement from many, because when you disagree you present evidence that formerly wasn't part of my knowledge base. I also trust that you'd never attack me personally.