No doubt, the then anthropologists were highly influenced by male-stream vision of their time. But even more than this, were they actually paid to promote Darwin’s theory of women inferiority? (which is more of rhetorical question, I presume:/).
Quote:
Originally Posted by pauleo
What about the college gender gap favoring women now, and the superior performance of females in schools?
|
Hopefully, as these superior females graduate they’ll restore historical truth
. For now there is unfortunately only one well-known female, who conducts such researches on a large scale, anthropologist Olga Soffer. But alas, she who fights alone cannot do much. Even the book The Invisible Sex: Uncovering the True Roles of Women in Prehistory she issued in co-authorship with Adovasio and Page is taken with a chuckle, at best.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nancy LC
Well, judging from how accurate those "fertility goddesses" look there must have been some really, really obese women in that era. I wonder how they got so fat?
|
Nancy, I believe there is nothing to do with obesity, it is just a hyperbolized expression of fertility, which was highly praised at that era of high mortality rate. It is rather the totem to which females prayed asking for fertility or successful pregnancy.
Moreover, you well see by yourself how toned, sort of well-knit your body becomes with paleo eating.
You know, as to that picture there is actually the other item which caught my attention: the hat or hairdo of that portly lady, just take a look how finely these braids are woven, in all my sincerity I can hardly weave even one of such multiple braids. It reminded me of marine cordage at my dad’s vessel. With all the evidence from Soffer, Adovasio and Lee-Thorp, prehistoric women appear to have really taken an active part in feeding their families and hunting activities, net hunting in particular, with the group of males and females throwing net over prey and clubbing it to death. So females were in great macho shape