So, according to Atkins, and most places I read about on the wonderful interwebs, you're only supposed to eat when hungry on a lchf diet. Problem is, I am someone who sees clients all day, so I only really get a moment for breakfast, lunch, then dinner. There may be periods of time when I do feel hunger, but can't really do anything about it (sometimes I eek in a snack during work if I have a time slot without a client and if I'm hungry). THEN, to make up for a lack of calories during the day, at night I snack after dinner. I have always snacked after dinner, but now it's just enough to get me to 1200 or 1300 calories. Having been a calorie counter before this, I feel scared to stay away from the snacks and only come in 900-1000 calories by the end of the day, especially since I run off almost 500 calories 5 days a week (according to my Polar Heart rate monitor), and try to lift weights for another 300 calories at least 4 days a week.
Now, I know I could increase my breakfast and lunch, but I'm not that hungry at either meal. I eat until I'm satiated for breakfast (2 eggs), really full for lunch (large salad of spinach, ranch dressing, whole can of tuna, and a cucumber is a good example), and full at dinner (steak, chicken, or bacon along with another salad). By the time I'm in "snack mode" I'm not really hungry, I just want a snack. AND I need the snack if I am to eat enough calories for the day (not to mention I just enjoy being able to snack
). I am not mindless with snacking mind you. I portion out one serving of nuts or low carb cheese and eat on it slowly.
Since I just started, I haven't lost much weight yet (3 lbs in a week and a half), so I haven't had a lot of time to figure my body out. I'm just wondering what you guys think is the more correct way of thinking - eat when hungry and it's fine if you only get 1000 calories or less (even with exercise), or at least try to get enough calories to support a healthy metabolism? Any thoughts?