View Single Post
  #183   ^
Old Thu, Jan-17-13, 17:54
Liz53's Avatar
Liz53 Liz53 is offline
Senior Member
Posts: 6,140
 
Plan: Mostly Fung/IDM
Stats: 165/138.4/135 Female 63
BF:???/better/???
Progress: 89%
Location: Washington state
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by teaser

If not the carbohydrate hypothesis, why does low carb work? You could say low palatability... but lots of people tried low fat, lost the weight, couldn't stick to it long term... But maybe it's a reward thing? If low carb is high-reward without being hyperpalatable, where low fat is low palatability (without being particularly rewarding), there'd be room for us low carbers to continue in our smugness.


How are you distinguishing between palatability and reward? I understand this is probably Stephen Guyenet's terminology, but his whole argument seems circular to me. What is he really trying to say?
Reply With Quote