Tue, Jun-30-09, 17:01
|
|
Senior Member
Posts: 651
|
|
Plan: Mostly carnivory
Stats: 145/145/145
BF:
Progress: -20%
Location: Ohio
|
|
Quote:
"High vitamin D intake is associated with brain lesions in elderly subjects, possibly as a result of vascular calcification (Payne et al., 2007).
Quote:
This always has me in fits of hysterics to think anyone can have been taken in by such a dumb piece of research. Now think why would anyone conduct a study spending hundreds of $ on MRI scans and not use a cheap $40 25(OH)D test to show what status those people actually had. Diet only represents 10% of your vitamin D intake. Only a fool would assess vitamin d status from a food diary. You will have to do better than that if you want me to stop laughing at you.
|
Agreed. Additionally, those of us who are more well versed in traditional diets and Price & Masterjohn's research are aware of the synergistic protection provided by the other fat soluble nutrients, namely vitamins A & K2, both of which are shown to protect against inappropriate calcification in the system in the presence of even very large doses of vitamin D. It isn't just D toxicity or 'high D', it's an imbalance of the other synergistic nutrients that causes the negative affects of too much of one individual vitamin or nutritional substance. (I know I sound a little like a broken record). Please try to cast your gaze past these vacuum studies.
|