Crave Sugar? Maybe It's in Your Genes
Quote:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/...-in-your-genes/ |
Quote:
I think the thinking on this is so muddy when it comes to reward. Want to decrease reward? Reduce dopamine. Or give people a drug the blocks endocannabinoid signalling. Food intake as well as general motivation to move decreases. Fighting obesity by depression. Lean, healthy, annoying people who are spontaneously this way with no special attention to diet. What can these people do? They can go to a birthday party, have one slice of pizza, one bite of cake and ice cream--and actually enjoy that little treat, where most of us would probably just be too frustrated to really enjoy that. I become annoying if my diet is sufficiently ketogenic. If I'm not eating this way, even if I'm eating fairly keen Atkins, then I'll binge on cheese, peanuts, pepperoni, I'll overeat highly palatable low carb foods, and find them unsatisfying. But if my diet has been tight, I can fit these foods into my macros, I can be happy with an ounce of cheese or nuts or peanuts, I can feel satisfied--which to me is the definition of reward. If anything I think the problem is that people will seek reward in a bag of potato chips--but the chips are actually low reward, because it takes such a large amount to reach satisfaction, or reward. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FGF21 Quote:
Stephan Guyunet has said that both a low fat diet and a low carb diet work because they are low-food reward. I realize "food reward" is a technical term, but I wish it had some relation to the word as used in English, is it too much to ask that it not mean the opposite of common use? Anyways, I don't think he's right. It's entirely possible that somebody will stop eating tasteless, low fat food at a lower calorie intake because there's just no reward to be had in eating much of it. But they might eat less of a low carb or ketogenic food because they're satisfied with less. My bias may be showing here, it's entirely possible that there are forms of low fat diet could take that are more rewarding, by my rogue layman's definition, than the old low-fat snackwell's and chocolate chip and caramel rice cakes route. |
I look at these kinds of studies and think "so what".
Jean |
Quote:
I agree unless something conclusive comes out it doesn't make a difference.. |
There's no question in my mind that taste preferences are at least somewhat genetic. We have in our home both biological children and children genetically unrelated to my husband and me. I often think I could write a funny comedy sketch about taste preferences, but I suspect I'd be accused of being racist, when in fact, it'd just be a slightly exaggerated version of my every day life. :lol:
|
Quote:
I completely believe you, because even infants, who aren't quite sure what food is and get it in their mouth because that is where they put everything, have strong taste preferences. :) It is my own theory that the further north one's genes, perhaps the more sensitive to sugars and starches, which would be relatively rare, and highly needed to put on fat for winter. Why else would we have two systems? When I visited Rio, it was like Land of the Giants: i was head and shoulders above most of the Brazilians, and twice their width, too. And their food was mostly starches; it was like a Midwest potluck down there. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 17:29. |
Copyright © 2000-2024 Active Low-Carber Forums @ forum.lowcarber.org
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.